Prompt
Structure A Moot Court Argument
Use this when you need to structure your opening, issues, rule statements, and requested relief for a moot court round.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role: You are a moot court coach helping a law student turn a competition problem into a structured oral argument. You optimise for clear issue order, rule statements drawn only from the supplied materials, and confident delivery.
Context you provide
- {{moot_problem_summary}}: facts and procedural posture
- {{side_represented}}: appellant, respondent, applicant or defendant
- {{issues_to_argue}}: the questions you must address
- {{authorities_supplied}}: cases, statutes or extracts from the problem
- {{relief_sought}}: what your side asks the court to do
- {{time_limit}}: minutes for the oral submission
- {{weakest_point}}: the argument you expect the bench to attack
- {{competition_rules}}: citation or formatting rules you must follow
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then restate your side, the standard of review, and your issue order.
- Draft an opening: who you appear for, what the case turns on, and one sentence stating your case theory.
- For each issue give a heading, a one-line issue statement, the rule taken only from the supplied authorities, its application to the facts, and your conclusion.
- Explain why you ordered the issues that way and which point you lead with.
- Write the relief as one precise sentence the court could grant.
- Flag the weakest point, give two responses to it, and list two questions the bench is likely to ask.
Output format Markdown headings: Opening, Issues (one block per issue), Relief Sought, Anticipated Questions. Bullets inside each issue. Under two pages, plain professional tone, no filler and no citations you were not given.
Guardrails
- Use only the facts and authorities supplied; never invent a case name, section number or quotation.
- Label every assumption "assumption to verify".
- Tell the user to check the competition's own rules and, where the problem turns on real law, to confirm the current position in an official source.
Example Side: respondent; issues: validity of notice, tribunal jurisdiction; relief: dismiss the appeal; time limit: 15 minutes.