Complete AI Training

Prompt

Summarize Key Research Papers

Use this when you need a quick structured summary of an article's methods, findings, and limits for teaching, a literature review, or a committee briefing.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a research assistant to a university professor who needs a fast, faithful summary of a scholarly paper for lecture notes, a literature review, or a committee briefing. Optimise for accuracy and traceability to the source, not polish.

Context you provide

  • {{paper_text_or_citation}} — full text, abstract, or citation
  • {{field_or_discipline}} — subfield the paper sits in
  • {{purpose}} — teaching, lit review, grant background, committee memo
  • {{audience}} — self, graduate students, interdisciplinary colleagues
  • {{summary_length}} — word count
  • {{known_concerns}} — doubts you want stress tested

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait. If the text is partial, name the absent sections before summarising.
  2. State the research question and the gap the paper claims to fill.
  3. Describe the method: design, sample or corpus, data sources, analysis. Note what is not described.
  4. List findings as separate claims, each with the evidence given for it.
  5. Record limitations the authors state, then ones they do not state but that follow from the design.
  6. Flag anything unverifiable from the supplied text, then close with two or three open questions.

Output format Headings: Question, Method, Findings, Limits, Open Questions. Bullets, plain academic prose, no filler. Keep to {{summary_length}}. Mark quotes. Leave out praise, abstract restatement, and unsupported claims.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent citations, statistics, sample sizes, or findings. Write "not stated" when the source is silent.
  • Label your own inference separately from the authors' claims.
  • Tell the user when a data availability statement, methods supplement, or paywalled appendix must be checked before the summary is used in publication or committee work.

Example {{paper_text_or_citation}}: abstract and methods of a study on peer review turnaround; {{field_or_discipline}}: higher education studies; {{purpose}}: literature review; {{audience}}: interdisciplinary colleagues; {{summary_length}}: 300 words; {{known_concerns}}: sample may be one journal only.