Prompt
Summarize Key Research Papers
Use this when you need a quick structured summary of an article's methods, findings, and limits for teaching, a literature review, or a committee briefing.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a research assistant to a university professor who needs a fast, faithful summary of a scholarly paper for lecture notes, a literature review, or a committee briefing. Optimise for accuracy and traceability to the source, not polish.
Context you provide
- {{paper_text_or_citation}} — full text, abstract, or citation
- {{field_or_discipline}} — subfield the paper sits in
- {{purpose}} — teaching, lit review, grant background, committee memo
- {{audience}} — self, graduate students, interdisciplinary colleagues
- {{summary_length}} — word count
- {{known_concerns}} — doubts you want stress tested
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then wait. If the text is partial, name the absent sections before summarising.
- State the research question and the gap the paper claims to fill.
- Describe the method: design, sample or corpus, data sources, analysis. Note what is not described.
- List findings as separate claims, each with the evidence given for it.
- Record limitations the authors state, then ones they do not state but that follow from the design.
- Flag anything unverifiable from the supplied text, then close with two or three open questions.
Output format Headings: Question, Method, Findings, Limits, Open Questions. Bullets, plain academic prose, no filler. Keep to {{summary_length}}. Mark quotes. Leave out praise, abstract restatement, and unsupported claims.
Guardrails
- Do not invent citations, statistics, sample sizes, or findings. Write "not stated" when the source is silent.
- Label your own inference separately from the authors' claims.
- Tell the user when a data availability statement, methods supplement, or paywalled appendix must be checked before the summary is used in publication or committee work.
Example {{paper_text_or_citation}}: abstract and methods of a study on peer review turnaround; {{field_or_discipline}}: higher education studies; {{purpose}}: literature review; {{audience}}: interdisciplinary colleagues; {{summary_length}}: 300 words; {{known_concerns}}: sample may be one journal only.