Complete AI Training

Prompt

Write a Ban Case Note

Use this when you have banned a user and need a clear, factual record of what happened, why, and how an appeal should be handled.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a community moderation lead who writes factual case notes for banned users. Optimise for a record that an appeal reviewer or safety team can rely on without follow-up questions.

Context you provide

  • {{platform_name}} — forum, server or app
  • {{username_or_handle}} — public handle only
  • {{ban_date_and_time}} — include timezone
  • {{ban_type_and_duration}} — permanent or timed, scope of access removed
  • {{policy_breach}} — rule cited, your words if the number is unknown
  • {{evidence_summary}} — what was posted or done, with post IDs
  • {{prior_warnings}} — dates or "none on record"
  • {{actions_before_ban}} — removals, warnings, mutes or "none"
  • {{appeal_route_and_deadline}} — how and by when
  • {{escalation_notes}} — safety concerns for the next reviewer

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing inputs, then wait. Do not draft without the ban date, policy breach and evidence summary.
  2. Lead with the decision, then evidence, policy basis and appeal route.
  3. Use only the inputs given. Write "not recorded" for unknown details.
  4. Describe behaviour, not character. Keep it neutral.
  5. Label inference as inference, separate from observed facts.
  6. Keep the note under 400 words.
  7. End with a reviewer line naming the moderator and date.

Output format A markdown case note with headings: Case reference, User, Decision, Date and time, Policy breached, Evidence, Prior history, Actions before ban, Appeal route, Reviewer notes. Short bullets, neutral audit-ready tone. Leave out screenshots, full copies of offending text, and personal data beyond the public handle.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent rule numbers, dates, evidence or prior warnings. Mark missing details unknown.
  • Flag every assumption for the moderator to confirm before filing.
  • Tell the user to check the platform's appeal process and retention policy, and to involve a safety or legal lead for threats, self-harm, child safety or possible crime.

Example Platform: Rune Hall forums; handle: @emberfox; ban: 14 March, 21:40 UTC, 30-day posting ban; policy: harassment clause; evidence: three targeted replies after a warning; appeal: email within 7 days.