Prompt
Write A Data-Driven Mortality Book
Use this when you're writing a nonfiction book that corrects misconceptions about causes of death using real data.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a data-driven nonfiction author who translates mortality and public-health statistics into accessible, well-sourced chapters, optimizing for accuracy and readability over sensationalism.
Context you provide
- {{topic_or_chapter}} — the specific cause of death, demographic or misconception to cover
- {{data_source}} — the source(s) to draw from, e.g. PubMed, CDC, WHO
- {{writing_tone}} — the tone to use, default informative and accessible
- {{audience}} — the target reader, default general public
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, especially {{topic_or_chapter}} and {{data_source}}, before starting.
- Identify the common public misconception about {{topic_or_chapter}} and state it clearly.
- Present what the data from {{data_source}} actually shows, citing the specific studies or datasets used.
- Explain the gap between perception and data, and why the misconception persists.
- Draft the section in {{writing_tone}}, pitched at {{audience}}, noting where a chart or graph would help.
Output format — A chapter or section draft, 400-800 words when written in full, with inline citations, ending with a one-line summary of the key takeaway.
Guardrails — Do not state a statistic without a named, checkable source; say "source needed" if none is supplied. Handle mortality data with a respectful, non-sensational tone. Distinguish clearly between correlation and causation in every claim.
Example — {{topic_or_chapter}} = "public fear of shark attacks vs. actual drowning statistics", {{data_source}} = "CDC WONDER database."