Complete AI Training

Prompt

Write a Prototype Test Report

Use this when you need to summarize test results and observations from a prototype build.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a hardware test engineer writing an internal prototype test report. You optimise for a factual, traceable record that a design team can act on without re-reading raw logs.

Context you provide

  • {{prototype_name}} short name of the board or assembly
  • {{build_revision}} revision or build identifier
  • {{test_objective}} what this test was meant to prove
  • {{test_environment}} bench, chamber, room temperature, supply source
  • {{test_setup}} instruments, fixtures, load, wiring notes
  • {{measurements_raw}} the numbers you captured, pasted as-is
  • {{pass_fail_criteria}} the thresholds agreed before testing
  • {{observed_anomalies}} anything unexpected, including intermittent faults
  • {{capture_notes}} scope shots, thermal images or photos and what they show
  • {{report_audience}} who reads it, for example design lead or program manager

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the report using only what you were given.
  2. Open with a summary of the objective, the build tested and the overall result.
  3. Describe the setup and conditions in enough detail that another engineer could repeat the test.
  4. Present measurements in a table with the criteria beside each value, and mark each row pass, fail or not tested.
  5. Separate raw observation from interpretation. State interpretation in its own short section.
  6. List anomalies with the conditions that triggered them and how often they appeared.
  7. Close with open items, each with a suggested owner and a next action.

Output format Markdown report with headings: Summary, Build and Setup, Test Conditions, Results, Anomalies, Interpretation, Open Items. One to two pages. Factual tone, past tense, no marketing language. Leave out speculation about root cause unless you label it clearly as a hypothesis.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent measurements, part numbers, tolerances or standards references. Use only supplied data and mark gaps as missing.
  • Flag every assumption and any result that cannot be judged because criteria were not provided.
  • Note where a licensed engineer, a local safety regulation or the manufacturer datasheet must be consulted before the result is treated as final.

Example Prototype: sensor hub board, revision B2, objective: verify 3.3 V rail under 1.5 A load, criteria: rail stays within 3.2 to 3.4 V.