AI app for executives and strategy · no coding needed
Board decision information purchase planner
Buy information that could actually change a decision.
Made for: Boards considering expensive strategic research
What it does for you
The problem
Research budgets fund broad reports with little decision relevance.
What it gives you
Board-reviewed research purchase brief
What you give it
Board-approved alternativesuncertainty estimates
How it works, step by step
- Map pivotal unknowns
- Compare possible research outcomes
- Estimate decision-sensitive evidence value
- Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions
- Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use
- Export a versioned board-reviewed research purchase brief with source references and unresolved questions
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Board decision information purchase planner with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Board decision information purchase planner with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build3 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare25 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)25 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria13 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data196 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
Buy information that could actually change a decision
Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect board-approved alternatives and uncertainty estimates, then follow this sequence: 1. Map pivotal unknowns. 2. Compare possible research outcomes. 3. Estimate decision-sensitive evidence value. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve board-reviewed research purchase brief, and measure avoided poor-decision exposure under explicit scenarios minus research cost against a documented baseline.
How the AI works
Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. Scenario estimates only; no objective probabilities invented. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.
Safeguards
Show source dates and distinguish evidence from strategic assumptions. Keep sensitive company plans restricted to authorized participants. Scenario estimates only; no objective probabilities invented. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.
What to build first
Pilot scope: Scenario estimates only; no objective probabilities invented. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: map pivotal unknowns; compare possible research outcomes. Support the third module with operator review: estimate decision-sensitive evidence value. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.
What it can connect to
Internal reports, public company information and decision registers. Read-only operational exports, calendars and finance or inventory records as relevant. Start with plan exports and retain human approval for execution. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.
The screens in detail
Primary screens: Constraint and input setup, Scenario comparison, Decision and pilot tracker. Place editable drivers and constraints beside a clearly labeled scenario output. Include a baseline view, comparison chart or schedule, and an assumptions history. Let users trace a proposed quantity or date back to its inputs. Keep forecasts distinct from actual results. Make the task-specific outcome board-reviewed research purchase brief visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.
