Public facility accessibility inventory

For municipal facility managers, turn verified facility audits and approved public descriptions into reviewed facility accessibility directory. Address this specific problem: accessibility information is inconsistent across facility listings. The aim: public accessibility information linked to dated inspection evidence. The pilot tests whether that benefit holds up against reviewer effort and real operating costs.

The buyer creates a project, supplies verified facility audits and approved public descriptions, and confirms scope and access. Users correct extracted facts, resolve flagged uncertainties and approve the final reviewed facility accessibility directory before use. Retain source links and a version history for the next cycle.

How the AI works

Summarize audited features without inferring accessibility from photos. Keep model suggestions separate from verified facts. Link factual outputs to authorized input evidence and show missing information explicitly. Use deterministic checks for counts, dates, identifiers and arithmetic where applicable. A designated reviewer validates consequential outputs and signs off the delivered result.

Safeguards

Preserve official source versions, accessibility and audit records. Confirm agency-specific procurement, records and data handling requirements during discovery. Existing inspection evidence only; no compliance certification. Require appropriate access and publication approval. Preserve source material, label AI drafts and make corrections traceable. Measure false positives and missed cases alongside speed.

What to build first

Costed pilot: Existing inspection evidence only; no compliance certification. Start with one buyer organization and a bounded set of representative inputs. Implement the first two modules: extract observed features; normalize descriptions. Support the third task through an assisted review queue: flag unverified claims. Handle the remaining required functions manually until validated. Include input upload, source references, user correction, a reviewer approval step and export of reviewed facility accessibility directory. Authentication, account isolation, deletion controls and basic operational logging are included. Specialized production certification, live write integrations and broader rollout are not included unless explicitly stated.

What it can connect to

Official publications, agency document stores and approved service workflows. Source systems, catalog exports and cloud file storage. Start with reversible CSV or file imports and validate identifiers before any direct writes. Begin with uploads and exports of verified facility audits and approved public descriptions. Any named system or connector is a candidate requiring current access and compatibility checks; no live connection is included by default.

The screens in detail

Use a searchable table or visual gallery with filters for the domain’s important attributes. Open each item into a detail drawer containing source records, ownership and history. Put proposed merges and field changes in a separate review queue. Provide a preview before any bulk export. Open with facility catalog; move into evidence gaps for the detailed task; finish in listing preview for review and handoff. Show the source record, uncertainty and approval status beside each proposed output.