Complete AI Training

AI app for insurance · no coding needed

Subrogation evidence chronology

Source-linked recovery chronology with uncertainty preserved.

Made for: Claims recovery support teams

What Subrogation evidence chronology looks like
Open the demo For members · a working demo with sample data

What it does for you

The problem

Recovery files lack a coherent chronology of documented events.

What it gives you

Reviewed recovery evidence chronology

What you give it

Authorized incident recordsprofessional instructions

How it works, step by step

  1. Extract dated events
  2. Link original evidence
  3. Flag conflicting timestamps
  4. Identify missing documents
  5. Record reviewer corrections
  6. Export chronology

What you see on screen

  • Evidence timeline
  • Missing facts
  • Review export

Build it yourself with your AI system

Build this app yourself, no coding needed

Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.

Sign in to see how to build it yourself

Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Subrogation evidence chronology with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.

Sign in Become a member

4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks

Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Subrogation evidence chronology with you.

Have Nexibeo build it

What's in the app pack

Included in the Complete AI Training membership.

  • The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
  • The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
  • A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
  • A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs

Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in

The files, for the technically curious
  • START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
  • README.mdOverview and links1 KB
  • questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
  • prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare24 KB
  • prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)24 KB
  • spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria13 KB
  • demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data195 KB

Questions

Do I need to know how to code?

No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.

What does it cost?

The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.

How long does it take?

The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.

Can I change it to fit my business?

Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.

More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first

For claims recovery support teams, turn authorized incident records and professional instructions into reviewed recovery evidence chronology. Address this specific problem: recovery files lack a coherent chronology of documented events. The aim: source-linked recovery chronology with uncertainty preserved. The pilot tests whether that benefit holds up against reviewer effort and real operating costs.

The buyer creates a project, supplies authorized incident records and professional instructions, and confirms scope and access. Users correct extracted facts, resolve flagged uncertainties and approve the final reviewed recovery evidence chronology before use. Retain source links and a version history for the next cycle.

How the AI works

Order documented events without inferring fault. Keep model suggestions separate from verified facts. Link factual outputs to authorized input evidence and show missing information explicitly. Use deterministic checks for counts, dates, identifiers and arithmetic where applicable. A designated reviewer validates consequential outputs and signs off the delivered result.

Safeguards

Separate document preparation from coverage, underwriting and claims decisions. Authorized professionals review policy meaning and customer commitments. Evidence organization; no liability or recovery decisions. Require appropriate access and publication approval. Preserve source material, label AI drafts and make corrections traceable. Measure false positives and missed cases alongside speed.

What to build first

Costed pilot: Evidence organization; no liability or recovery decisions. Start with one buyer organization and a bounded set of representative inputs. Implement the first two modules: extract dated events; link original evidence. Support the third task through an assisted review queue: flag conflicting timestamps. Handle the remaining required functions manually until validated. Include input upload, source references, user correction, a reviewer approval step and export of reviewed recovery evidence chronology. Authentication, account isolation, deletion controls and basic operational logging are included. Specialized production certification, live write integrations and broader rollout are not included unless explicitly stated.

What it can connect to

Broker-approved policy documents, case records and carrier requirements. Source systems, catalog exports and cloud file storage. Start with reversible CSV or file imports and validate identifiers before any direct writes. Begin with uploads and exports of authorized incident records and professional instructions. Any named system or connector is a candidate requiring current access and compatibility checks; no live connection is included by default.

The screens in detail

Use a searchable table or visual gallery with filters for the domain’s important attributes. Open each item into a detail drawer containing source records, ownership and history. Put proposed merges and field changes in a separate review queue. Provide a preview before any bulk export. Open with evidence timeline; move into missing facts for the detailed task; finish in review export for review and handoff. Show the source record, uncertainty and approval status beside each proposed output.