AI app for legal · no coding needed
Document chronology service
Every event remains traceable to its source and date interpretation.
Made for: Litigation teams reviewing large record sets
What it does for you
The problem
Constructing a defensible event timeline requires extensive reading.
What it gives you
Reviewed chronology with document references
What you give it
Authorized case documentsevent definitions
How it works, step by step
- Extract candidate events
- Distinguish document and event dates
- Link passages
- Flag date ambiguity
- Merge duplicates
- Export reviewed timelines
What you see on screen
- Document explorer
- dated timeline
- evidence review
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Document chronology service with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Document chronology service with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare22 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)22 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria12 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data198 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
For litigation teams reviewing large record sets, turn authorized case documents and event definitions into reviewed chronology with document references. Address the recurring problem: constructing a defensible event timeline requires extensive reading. The pilot measures verified event accuracy and reviewer hours against the buyer's current method, before the larger build.
Agree the decision and research questions, define permitted sources or participants, collect evidence, code findings, compare supporting and contradictory material, review interpretations, and deliver a cited brief with next questions. Start with authorized case documents and event definitions and finish with reviewed chronology with document references.
How the AI works
Assist with retrieval, transcription, structured extraction and thematic synthesis. Preserve source passages and methodological context. Human researchers validate inclusion, quotations and conclusions. Use real participants when customer research is required.
Safeguards
Preserve matter confidentiality, access boundaries and original evidence. Qualified professionals review legal interpretations and final client documents. Validate source access and reviewer availability during the pilot. Maintain customer-level access, data deletion controls and a record of final approvals.
What to build first
Begin with litigation teams reviewing large record sets and one recurring use case. Build the first two modules: extract candidate events; distinguish document and event dates. Provide operator assistance for the third module: link passages. Deliver reviewed chronology with document references through a manual review queue. Perform other necessary full-scope functions manually during the pilot. Include all applicable access, accuracy and professional-review controls from the start.
What it can connect to
Authorized matter files, firm templates and approved legal knowledge collections. Permitted research libraries, interview recording imports, citation exports and document editors. Preserve original source metadata throughout the workflow. These are candidate integration categories, not verified supported connectors.
The screens in detail
Organize work by research question. Show a source library, an evidence matrix and a draft findings panel with linked quotations. Keep contradictory findings and unanswered questions visible. Allow reviewers to inspect the original context before accepting an interpretation. In this product, the first view is document explorer, followed by dated timeline and evidence review.
