AI app for legal · no coding needed
Legal-service intake conversion experiment
Improve access to professional review through usable administration.
Made for: Small law firm practice managers
What it does for you
The problem
Prospective clients abandon administrative intake before professional review.
What it gives you
Firm-approved intake usability improvement
What you give it
Consented usability sessionsfirm-approved intake rules
How it works, step by step
- Observe completion barriers
- Prototype clearer task flows
- Measure complete inquiry rates
- Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions
- Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use
- Export a versioned firm-approved intake usability improvement with source references and unresolved questions
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Legal-service intake conversion experiment with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Legal-service intake conversion experiment with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build3 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare28 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)28 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria15 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data202 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
Improve access to professional review through usable administration
Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect consented usability sessions and firm-approved intake rules, then follow this sequence: 1. Observe completion barriers. 2. Prototype clearer task flows. 3. Measure complete inquiry rates. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve firm-approved intake usability improvement, and measure qualified complete inquiries and handling time minus experiment cost against a documented baseline.
How the AI works
Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. No client-merit scoring or legal advice; confidentiality preserved. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.
Safeguards
Preserve matter confidentiality, access boundaries and original evidence. Qualified professionals review legal interpretations and final client documents. No client-merit scoring or legal advice; confidentiality preserved. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.
What to build first
Pilot scope: No client-merit scoring or legal advice; confidentiality preserved. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: observe completion barriers; prototype clearer task flows. Support the third module with operator review: measure complete inquiry rates. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.
What it can connect to
Authorized matter files, firm templates and approved legal knowledge collections. Permitted research libraries, interview recording imports, citation exports and document editors. Preserve original source metadata throughout the workflow. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.
The screens in detail
Primary screens: Research question and consent, Evidence comparison, Reviewed findings and experiment. Organize work by research question. Show a source library, an evidence matrix and a draft findings panel with linked quotations. Keep contradictory findings and unanswered questions visible. Allow reviewers to inspect the original context before accepting an interpretation. Make the task-specific outcome firm-approved intake usability improvement visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.
