Los Angeles Unified School District has enacted a districtwide moratorium on student use of generative AI for the current school year, officials disclosed this week. The policy, put in place by senior administrators without a formal school board vote, blocks access to generative AI tools on all district-owned devices until further notice. The move aligns with the board's unanimous June vote to limit student screen time and comes as New York City announced its own restrictions on student-facing AI.
The moratorium surfaced at the first meeting of a board committee examining AI issues, catching board members by surprise. Chief Academic Officer Pia Sadaqatmal and interim Chief Information Officer Douglas Le told the committee that generative AI would be out of reach for students on district devices.
"I, even as a board member, was under the expectation that we were still operating under last year's policy," said board member Kelly Gonez. "The fact that it's different today, this school year, is important." Gonez had believed the district was still following an earlier policy that made AI available to older students after they completed digital literacy units.
Board member Nick Melvoin also expressed surprise but did not object to the moratorium. "If the policy is we're not going to allow students to use generative AI for the meantime, then we should publicize that," Melvoin said. "But also, that didn't really come from the board, so I'm of two minds on that right now."
Parent activists and advocates respond
Activist parents who had been campaigning for stricter screen-time rules and an AI moratorium learned of the policy at the meeting. Bridie Lee, a leader of the group Schools Beyond Screens L.A., abandoned her prepared remarks. "I would like to make it crystal clear to everyone reporting on this today that LAUSD has made history again," Lee said. "Thank you to the team for listening to the evidence, the facts, and perhaps our work here is done."
Common Sense Media also praised the decision. Yvette Renteria, the nonprofit's chief program officer, said the district "is taking the time needed to address the significant risks associated with student use of generative AI." She added that "many leading AI products are not designed for safety or to properly support learning."
Jing Lei, a Syracuse University professor and education technology expert, cautioned that bans alone are insufficient. "Banning young children from technology use excludes them from learning from meaningful educational opportunities through technology," she said, "while 20 minutes of technology use for older students can be 20 minutes too many if these 20 minutes are not intentionally designed to support meaningful learning outcomes."
What the moratorium covers
The district will continue using non-generative AI for education. Examples include adaptive learning systems that adjust question difficulty based on student performance, speech-recognition tools for reading fluency, and text-to-speech or translation tools. Students can still use Google to search for information, but Google's "AI Mode" has been turned off on student accounts and devices. Google search results may still display a short AI-generated summary at the top of the page, though the district said Google is working on a technical update to let administrators disable that feature completely.
The moratorium applies to district-owned devices. No district policy yet governs what students do on personal devices, though activity on school accounts accessed through personal devices can be tracked. Teachers are not barred from using AI on district devices, but no districtwide system exists for teachers to use AI to grade student work or identify academic dishonesty.
New York City takes a parallel step
On the same day, New York City announced it will ban student-facing generative AI tools - including chatbots and AI tutors - in preschool through eighth-grade classrooms, affecting nearly 600,000 students. High school students will see limited AI use through five pilot programs. Every public high school student must complete two 45-minute AI-literacy modules covering what AI is, bias, risks, ethics, and future skills. Companion chatbots are prohibited across all grades.
L.A. Unified's total moratorium goes further than New York's approach, though New York has articulated a more specific immediate plan. At least 37 states have issued AI guidance for schools, but no single national definition of AI literacy exists.
Why this matters for educators
L.A. Unified's moratorium signals a shift toward stricter district-level control over AI access, even without formal board authorization. For teachers and administrators, the immediate takeaway is practical: generative AI tools students may have used last year are now blocked on school devices. Educators planning lessons that involve AI for Education will need to work within the non-generative AI tools the district has approved. Teachers looking to build their own understanding of classroom AI use can explore resources like an AI for Teachers learning path, but should verify whether any hands-on student activities comply with current district policy. The policy also leaves open questions about enforcement on personal devices and what a permanent AI framework will look like once the moratorium lifts.
Your membership also unlocks:
