A Tennessee woman is suing the City of Fargo and a police detective after she spent six months in jail based on an arrest that relied on facial recognition software. The federal lawsuit, filed Tuesday by Angela Lipps, alleges civil rights violations and malicious prosecution, marking a legal challenge to law enforcement's use of AI-powered identification tools.
Fargo police arrested Lipps in Tennessee last year in connection with a bank fraud case. Investigators said they used facial recognition software to link her to the suspect. Lipps maintained she had never been to North Dakota, and her bank records placed her in Tennessee at the time of the crime. She was released in December after six months in custody.
The allegations and lasting harm
The lawsuit details five counts against the City of Fargo and Detective Lucas Heck. According to the filing, Lipps sustained physical and mental injuries during her incarceration. "Since the incident, Lipps continues to suffer emotional distress," the lawsuit states. "Lipps has continuing trauma, anxiety and panic attacks. She does not trust law enforcement or strangers. She is no longer social. She has general paranoia. She constantly fears for her safety and liberty."
Dane DeKrey, one of Lipps's attorneys, said the case carries implications beyond a single wrongful arrest. "This can send a message to other departments to not do what was done here," he said. "So I think [the lawsuit] is both for herself and also broader for everyone who may get ensnared in something like this with the rise of AI." Lipps is requesting a jury trial.
Police response and missing apology
The City of Fargo declined to comment on the lawsuit. The police department initially denied wrongdoing, but then-Police Chief Dave Zibolski acknowledged at a March press conference that errors occurred during the investigation. He apologized to the community at that time but stopped short of apologizing directly to Lipps, citing the active investigation.
DeKrey said his client has not received the specific exoneration she seeks. "There has been no formal retraction of the cloud of suspicion on our client," he said. "They dismissed the charges, but when they did, and when we got involved, we asked for a specific admission of wrongdoing, and a specific admission that Ms. Lipps was not part of this conduct in any way, and we haven't gotten that."
Why this matters for legal and government professionals
This case tests how courts will handle liability when law enforcement agencies deploy AI for Government functions without sufficient human verification. For prosecutors and police departments, the lawsuit underscores the legal exposure that comes from treating algorithmic matches as probable cause. For AI for Policy Makers, the six-month detention of a person whose bank records placed her in another state highlights the gap between AI adoption speed and the procedural safeguards needed to prevent demonstrably false identifications from reaching an arrest stage.
Your membership also unlocks:
