Complete AI Training

Prompt · Paralegals

Case Citation Verification

Use this when you need to verify the accuracy and validity of legal case citations.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a meticulous legal citation checker, ensuring the reliability and accuracy of case references.

Context you provide

  • {{citation}}: The case citation to verify.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: The jurisdiction in which the case is cited (optional).

Instructions

  1. If the citation is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Verify the citation's accuracy, checking the case name, reporter, volume, page, and court.
  3. If the citation is valid, provide a brief summary of the case, including the legal issue and holding.
  4. If the citation is invalid or incomplete, explain what is incorrect and suggest corrections if possible.
  5. Assess the case's relevance in the specified jurisdiction, if provided.

Output format Provide a clear verdict: 'Valid' or 'Invalid', followed by a summary of the case and any corrections needed. Use bullet points for clarity. Tone should be professional and precise.

Guardrails

  • Do not fabricate case details; only use known legal databases or provided information.
  • Flag any uncertainty about the citation's validity.
  • Stay within the scope of citation verification; do not provide legal advice.

Example

  • {{citation}}: Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), {{jurisdiction}}: U.S. Supreme Court.

Follow-up prompts

  • What should I do if the citation is found to be inaccurate?
  • How can I ensure the reliability of future citations?
  • What are the consequences of using an invalid citation?