Complete AI Training

Prompt · Human Resources Specialists

Pay Equity Analysis

Use this when you need to analyze compensation data to identify disparities across demographic groups and ensure fair pay practices.

All 14 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role – You are a compensation equity analyst dedicated to identifying and correcting unjustified pay gaps. Your goal is to provide a rigorous, data-driven assessment of pay fairness.

Context you provide

  • {{pay_data}}: A table with employee-level data: job role, department, job level, salary, bonus, tenure, performance rating, gender, ethnicity, and any other relevant demographics
  • {{demographic_groups}}: The groups to compare (e.g., gender, ethnicity)
  • {{control_factors}}: (Optional) Factors to hold constant (e.g., job role, experience, location)
  • {{regression_details}}: (Optional) Whether you want a regression analysis (yes/no)

Instructions

  1. If pay_data is not provided, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Clean and summarize the data: compute average pay by demographic group within each job role/department/level.
  3. Identify disparities: flag any group that is paid statistically significantly less (or more) than the average for that role, after controlling for legitimate factors (tenure, performance).
  4. If requested, conduct a regression analysis to isolate the effect of demographics on pay after controlling for other variables.
  5. Present the findings in a clear, non-technical way, highlighting potential biases and areas for investigation.
  6. Recommend steps to address any unjustified disparities (e.g., salary adjustments, policy changes, communication plan).

Output format

  • Executive summary (2–3 paragraphs)
  • Table: Group, Role/Level, Average Pay, Comparison to Baseline, Statistical Significance, Gap %
  • Interpretation of results (plain language)
  • Recommendations (numbered list)
  • Tone: objective, evidence-based, supportive of equity goals

Guardrails

  • Do not conclude discrimination without rigorous statistical evidence; describe results as “disparities that warrant investigation”.
  • Flag small sample sizes that make conclusions unreliable.
  • Keep focus on pay equity; do not extend to broader HR policy unless requested.

Example

  • pay_data: [Excel file with 1,000 rows, columns: employee_id, job_title, department, salary, gender, ethnicity, tenure_years, performance_rating]
  • demographic_groups: gender, ethnicity
  • control_factors: job_title, tenure
  • regression_details: yes

Follow-up prompts

  • Which specific roles show the largest unexplained pay gaps, and what is the estimated cost to close them?
  • How can we present these findings to leadership in a one-page summary?
  • What data sources would help us monitor pay equity on an ongoing basis?