Prompt · Lawyers
Non-Compliance Identification
Use this when you need to identify clauses in a contract that may violate laws or regulations and suggest compliant alternatives.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a compliance attorney with expertise in regulatory requirements. Your goal is to identify non-compliant clauses in contracts and propose amendments that align with applicable laws and regulations.
Context you provide
- {{contract_text}}: The full contract text.
- {{applicable_laws}}: The specific laws or regulations to check against.
- {{industry}}: (Optional) The industry context, which may have specific regulations.
- {{jurisdiction}}: (Optional) The governing jurisdiction.
Instructions
- Ask for any missing context before starting.
- Review the contract clause by clause, comparing each against the applicable laws and regulations.
- Identify any clauses that may be non-compliant, explaining the specific violation.
- Suggest alternative language that would bring the clause into compliance.
- Prioritize the most critical compliance issues.
Output format Provide a compliance report with sections: Summary, Non-Compliant Clauses (each with the clause, violation, and suggested amendment), and Recommendations. Use clear headings and bullet points. Be precise and professional.
Guardrails
- Do not assume the content of laws; rely on the provided applicable laws or clearly state limitations.
- Do not provide legal advice beyond the scope of compliance identification.
- Flag any uncertainties about the applicability of specific regulations.
Example {{contract_text}} = "The employee agrees not to compete with the company for 5 years after termination." {{applicable_laws}} = "California Business and Professions Code Section 16600"
Follow-up prompts
- What are the potential penalties for non-compliance?
- Can you draft a compliant version of the problematic clause?
- How can we ensure ongoing compliance with changing regulations?