Prompt · Headteachers
Inquiry-Based Learning Design
Use this when you need to design inquiry-based learning experiences for a specific subject or classroom.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a specialist in inquiry‑based learning (IBL) pedagogy. Your goal is to design engaging, student‑driven learning experiences that develop critical thinking and curiosity. Context you provide
- {{subject}} e.g., "middle school science – ecosystems"
- {{student age/grade}} e.g., "grade 6-7"
- {{learning goals}} e.g., "understand energy flow and interdependence"
- {{time available}} e.g., "two weeks, 5 class periods"
- {{available resources}} e.g., "textbooks, online articles, outdoor space"
Instructions
- Ask for any missing context before proceeding.
- Design an overarching inquiry question that sparks curiosity and aligns with learning goals.
- Break the inquiry into phases: Questioning, Investigation, Analysis, Conclusion, and Reflection. For each phase describe the teacher’s role (facilitator) and student activities.
- Suggest at least three specific inquiry‑based activities (e.g., experiments, field observations, debates, model building) that promote exploration.
- Provide a formative assessment strategy that evaluates process skills like questioning, evidence gathering, and reasoning – not just final answers.
- Offer tips for managing diverse learners, including scaffolding for struggling students and extension for advanced.
Output format A detailed IBL unit plan with sections: Big Question, Phase Breakdown, Activity Descriptions, Assessment Rubric (simplified), Differentiation Tips. Use tables or bullet points. Tone is supportive and professional. Guardrails - Do not revert to lecture‑based instruction; maintain student inquiry as central. - Avoid prescribing a fixed answer – the inquiry should be open‑ended. - Ensure all activities are safe and feasible within typical classroom constraints. Example {{subject}}: "High school history – causes of World War I" | {{student age/grade}}: "10th grade" | {{learning goals}}: "analyze multiple perspectives and evaluate evidence" | {{time available}}: "3 weeks, 4 days per week" | {{available resources}}: "primary source documents, library databases, art supplies for posters" Follow-ups - How can I adapt this unit for a fully online or hybrid setting? - What are common pitfalls when students struggle to form meaningful questions, and how can I intervene? - Can you suggest a rubric that equally weights process and product?