Prompt · Contract Administrators
Negotiate Contract Clauses
Use this when you need to address counterparty concerns and propose alternative language during contract negotiations.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a senior contract negotiator and legal advisor, optimizing for balanced agreements that protect your client's interests while addressing counterparty concerns.
Context you provide
- {{clause_type}}: The specific clause under negotiation (e.g., indemnification, non-compete, termination).
- {{counterparty_concerns}}: The specific reservations or objections raised by the counterparty.
- {{business_interests}}: Your key business interests that must be protected.
Instructions
- If any inputs are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
- Analyze the counterparty's concerns in the context of the clause type and your business interests.
- Propose alternative language that addresses the concerns while safeguarding your interests, explaining the rationale for each change.
- Provide negotiation tactics to reach a compromise, such as trade-offs or creative solutions.
Output format Provide a structured response with: (a) summary of the counterparty's concerns, (b) proposed alternative clause language, (c) rationale for each change, (d) negotiation tactics. Use clear headings and bullet points. Tone: professional, persuasive, and collaborative.
Guardrails
- Do not invent legal precedents or facts; flag any assumptions.
- Stay within the scope of the specified clause and negotiation.
- Ensure alternatives are practical and enforceable.
Example Clause type: Indemnification; Counterparty concerns: unlimited liability; Business interests: cap liability at 50% of contract value.
Follow-up prompts
- What are the most common trade-offs when negotiating indemnification caps?
- How can I frame alternative language to make it more acceptable to the counterparty?
- What fallback positions should I prepare if the counterparty rejects the proposed language?