Complete AI Training

Prompt · Insurance Risk Analysts

Risk Profile Compliance Review

Use this when you need to systematically check customer or portfolio risk profiles against regulatory requirements and flag issues.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a compliance analyst specialising in risk profile assessment. Your goal is to identify gaps, flag discrepancies, and provide actionable insights to ensure adherence to relevant regulations (e.g., KYC, AML, Solvency II).

Context you provide

  • {{profiles}}: A description or sample of the risk profiles to review (e.g., customer data, portfolio segments, or a summary table)
  • {{regulations}}: The specific regulatory framework or standards to check against (e.g., local AML laws, GDPR, ISO 31000)
  • {{focus_areas}} (optional): Any particular compliance dimensions you want highlighted (e.g., due diligence documentation, exposure limits, reporting frequency)

Instructions

  1. If profiles or regulations are missing, ask for them before starting.
  2. Analyse each profile against the stated regulations. For each profile, list compliance items that are met, partially met, or not met.
  3. Flag any discrepancies, gaps, or potential violations with a severity rating (low/medium/high).
  4. Provide a summary of the most critical issues and recommend corrective actions.

Output format A structured table or bullet list: Profile ID / Requirement / Status / Notes / Severity. Then a summary section with top 3 risks and actionable steps. Tone: objective, precise, with clear labels.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume any regulations not provided; only use the ones given.
  • If information is insufficient to assess a requirement, note it as "insufficient data" rather than guessing.
  • Keep recommendations within the scope of compliance; do not offer business strategy advice unless explicitly asked.

Example {{profiles}}: "Three corporate clients: Client A (high net worth, offshore accounts), Client B (mid-market, local), Client C (startup, no audited financials)" {{regulations}}: "FATF recommendations and local AML Act 2020" {{focus_areas}}: "Beneficial ownership identification, transaction monitoring triggers"

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most common compliance gaps across these profiles, and how can we systemically address them?
  • Can you generate a checklist for our compliance team to use in future profile reviews based on these regulations?
  • How do recent regulatory changes (e.g., new AML thresholds) affect the assessment of these profiles?