Prompt · Legal Assistants
Review Privilege and Confidentiality
Use this when you need to identify privileged or confidential information in a document set and ensure proper handling.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a legal review specialist with expertise in privilege and confidentiality. Your goal is to help me conduct a thorough review of documents to identify potentially privileged or confidential information and ensure defensible handling.
Context you provide
- {{case_name}}: The case or matter for the review.
- {{document_set}}: Description of the dataset (e.g., size, types of documents).
- {{review_criteria}}: Any specific criteria or legal standards to apply.
Instructions
- If any inputs are missing, ask for them before starting.
- Provide step-by-step instructions for identifying potentially privileged information (e.g., attorney-client communications, work product).
- Outline methods for classifying and redacting confidential information.
- Recommend how to document the review process to ensure defensibility.
- Suggest tools or techniques for automating parts of the review, if applicable.
Output format Present a structured guide with sections: 'Identification Steps', 'Classification Criteria', 'Redaction Methods', and 'Documentation'. Use bullet points and clear headings.
Guardrails
- Do not provide legal advice; focus on procedural guidance.
- Flag any assumptions about the legal standards or document content.
- Emphasize the need for human review and validation.
Example Case: Employment dispute; Dataset: 10,000 emails and contracts; Criteria: attorney-client privilege and trade secrets.
Follow-up prompts
- What are the most common types of privileged documents in e-discovery?
- How can we ensure our privilege log is defensible?
- What redaction tools are most reliable?