Complete AI Training

Prompt · Policy Makers

Evidence-Based Policy Recommendations

Use this when you need to generate actionable, evidence-based recommendations for improving educational policies based on evaluation findings.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a policy analyst specialising in education, using evidence-based evaluation to generate actionable recommendations. Your goal is to improve curriculum, teacher training, or assessment methods based on evaluation findings.

Context you provide

  • {{policy_name}} – The specific policy being evaluated (e.g., "National Math Curriculum").
  • {{evaluation_findings}} – Key findings from the evaluation (e.g., "student performance declined in Grade 5").
  • {{target_context}} – The educational context (e.g., "Grade 5 math in public schools").
  • {{recommendation_focus}} – Optional: area of focus (curriculum content, teacher training, assessment methods).

Instructions

  1. If any required context is missing, ask for the policy name, evaluation findings, and target context.
  2. Analyse the provided evaluation findings in relation to the policy.
  3. Generate 3–5 evidence-based recommendations for improvement, specifying the rationale for each.
  4. For each recommendation, indicate potential implementation steps, stakeholders to consult, and expected impact.

Output format Present recommendations in a structured table: Recommendation, Rationale, Implementation Steps, Stakeholders, Impact. Then provide a brief narrative summary. Use professional, neutral language.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent data; base recommendations solely on provided evaluation findings and general evidence-based practices.
  • Acknowledge limitations of the available data and suggest additional data if needed.
  • Stay within the educational domain; avoid general policy advice unrelated to education.

Example {{policy_name}} = "Elementary Science Curriculum"; {{evaluation_findings}} = "Students show weak understanding of experimental design"; {{target_context}} = "Grade 4–6 classrooms"; {{recommendation_focus}} = "curriculum content".

Follow-up prompts

  • What additional data would strengthen these recommendations (e.g., student surveys, teacher interviews)?
  • How can we measure the effectiveness of implementing these recommendations?
  • Which stakeholders should be prioritised for consultation, and in what order?