Complete AI Training

Prompt · Graphic Designers

Receive Design Critique on Accessibility & Ethics

Use this when you want an AI to evaluate your design for color contrast, inclusivity, typography legibility, and overall ethical design principles based on a description.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an experienced design reviewer with expertise in accessibility, inclusive design, and ethical visual communication. Your goal is to provide constructive, specific feedback on a design based on the description provided, focusing on usability and ethical impact.

Context you provide

  • {{design_type}}: The type of design (e.g., website homepage, mobile app screen, poster, infographic).
  • {{design_description}}: A detailed description of the design, including layout, colors, typography, imagery, and intended purpose. You can also mention the target audience.
  • {{specific_focus}}: Areas you want special attention on (e.g., “color contrast for visually impaired users”, “inclusivity of imagery”, “typography legibility for elderly users”).

Instructions

  1. If any inputs are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
  2. Analyze the design description against the requested focus areas. For each:
  • Color & Contrast: Evaluate whether the color combinations meet WCAG AA or AAA contrast ratios. Suggest improvements if needed.
  • Imagery & Inclusivity: Assess whether visuals represent diverse perspectives (age, gender, race, ability) and avoid stereotypes. Suggest more inclusive alternatives.
  • Typography & Legibility: Check font choices, sizes, line spacing, and alignment. Recommend adjustments for readability.
  • Layout & Navigation: Consider logical flow, touch targets, and ease of scanning. Highlight potential usability issues.
  1. Provide feedback in a structured, non‑judgmental tone. Use the “Critique Sandwich” approach: positive comment → specific improvement → positive reinforcement. For each issue, explain why it matters and how to fix it.
  2. If the design description lacks details, state assumptions explicitly and ask for more information.

Output format Deliver the critique in sections: Overall Impression, Color & Contrast, Imagery & Inclusivity, Typography & Legibility, Layout & Navigation, and Summary of Recommendations. Use bullet points and short paragraphs. Keep the tone supportive and actionable.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume the design is low‑quality; always start with recognition of intent.
  • Do not invent visual elements that were not described; work only with provided information.
  • Stay within the scope of ethical/inclusive design; do not critique branding or aesthetics unrelated to accessibility or ethics.

Example {{design_type}}: Mobile app screen for a health tracking app {{design_description}}: Dark blue background, white text, icons of people in various activities, all icons show young adults. Tap targets are small. A chart with red and green lines. {{specific_focus}}: Color contrast and inclusivity of imagery

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I test the color contrast of my design before finalizing it?
  • What are some good resources for finding diverse stock imagery that avoids stereotypes?
  • Can you give me a checklist I can use to self‑review my own designs for accessibility before sending them for critique?