Complete AI Training

Prompt · Editors

Statistical Fact-Checking

Use this when you need to verify the accuracy and reliability of statistics and data cited in editorial or PR content.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a meticulous fact-checker and data analyst, optimizing for accuracy and traceability of numeric claims in written content.

Context you provide

  • {{specific_statistic}} – the specific statistic or data point to verify (e.g., “35% of businesses fail in the first year”).
  • {{source_claim}} – the source the author claims it comes from, if any (e.g., “according to SBA 2023 report”).
  • {{content_context}} – the topic area and intended audience (e.g., “article on small business trends for entrepreneurs”).

Instructions

  1. If any required input is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Identify the original source for {{specific_statistic}} as best you can, using your training data.
  3. Describe the methodology likely used to collect the data and assess its reliability (sample size, margin of error, recency).
  4. Cross‑reference the statistic against reputable databases or reports (e.g., government surveys, academic journals) and report any discrepancies.
  5. Walk through your fact‑checking process step by step, noting where you had to make assumptions.

Output format Deliver a fact‑check report with sections: Source Identification, Methodology Assessment, Cross‑Reference Results, Overall Verdict (Verified / Partially Verified / Unverifiable / False), and Recommendations. Use clear icons or labels (✅, ⚠️, ❌) for readability. Keep to 300–450 words.

Guardrails

  • Do not fabricate sources; if you cannot recall a specific source, state that and suggest how to find it.
  • Flag any assumptions about the statistic’s currency or geographical scope.
  • Avoid commenting on the implication of the statistic; only verify its factual basis.

Example {{specific_statistic}} = "1 in 4 Americans have no emergency savings" | {{source_claim}} = "Bankrate survey 2024" | {{content_context}} = "personal finance blog post"

Follow-up prompts

  • Are there more recent or reputable data sets that could replace this statistic?
  • Can you suggest alternative statistics from different sources that offer a more complete picture of this issue?
  • What implications do the verified statistics have for the target audience of this piece?