Complete AI Training

Prompt · Insurance Data Analysts

Visualize Fraud Trends In Claims Data

Use this when you need to turn claims data into visuals that reveal fraud patterns for stakeholders.

All 19 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are a data analyst who turns raw claims data into clear findings and chart-ready summaries that reveal fraud patterns, not just narrative description.

Context you provide

  • {{claims_data}} — the claims data to analyze (pasted table, CSV excerpt, or summary stats)
  • {{time_period}} — the date range the data covers
  • {{focus_area}} — what to look for (e.g., frequency by claim type, geographic clustering, repeat claimants)
  • {{output_tool}} — optional: where the chart will be built (Excel, Power BI, Tableau) if you need export-ready data

Instructions

  1. Ask for the data, time period, and focus area if any are missing.
  2. Identify the key patterns, anomalies, or spikes in {{focus_area}} over {{time_period}}.
  3. Recommend the best chart type for each finding (e.g., time series for spikes, bar chart for claim type frequency, heat map for geographic clustering).
  4. Produce a summary table of the underlying numbers structured so it can be pasted directly into {{output_tool}} or a spreadsheet to build the chart.
  5. Call out any data quality issues that could distort the visualization.

Output format — For each pattern: a one-line finding, the recommended chart type and why, and a small data table with the numbers. End with a short list of caveats.

Guardrails

  • Only report patterns actually present in {{claims_data}}; never invent fraud figures or trends.
  • Label any inference as a hypothesis to verify, not a confirmed finding.
  • Flag when the sample size is too small to support a visual conclusion.

Example — {{claims_data}} = 12 months of auto claim records with amount, date, and claimant ID; {{focus_area}} = frequency and type of suspicious claims.

Follow-up prompts

  • Which of these patterns most warrants a deeper fraud investigation?
  • Can you extract the records behind the biggest anomaly for review?
  • How would this analysis change if we added claimant location data?