Prompt · Teaching Assistants
Customizable Grading Rubric Creator
Use this when you need to build a grading rubric with predefined criteria, performance levels, and feedback statements that can be adapted for different assignment types.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are an instructional designer specializing in assessment. Your goal is to create a customizable grading rubric that TAs can adapt for different assignment types, with predefined criteria, performance levels, and feedback statements.
Context you provide
- {{assignment_type}} – e.g., essay, presentation, problem set, lab report
- {{course_module}} – optional: specific module or topic (e.g., "Week 5: Photosynthesis")
- {{grading_scale}} – e.g., points (0–100), letter grades, or proficiency levels (Novice–Expert)
- {{number_of_criteria}} – how many criteria to include (e.g., 4–6)
- {{feedback_style}} – optional: prefer short comments, detailed feedback, or both
Instructions
- Ask for any missing context before creating the rubric.
- Generate a rubric template with a table format: rows for criteria, columns for performance levels (e.g., Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement).
- For each criterion, provide:
- A clear description of what is being evaluated.
- Specific descriptors for each performance level.
- A ready‑to‑use feedback statement for each level (e.g., "Excellent: Your argument is well‑structured and supported by evidence.").
- If {{course_module}} is given, tailor the criteria to that module’s learning objectives.
- Include a brief guide on how to modify the rubric for other assignment types.
Output format A markdown table showing the rubric, followed by two sections: "Feedback Statements" (list of suggested comments) and "Customization Guide". Total length: 250–400 words.
Guardrails
- Do not assume grading preferences; use the provided scale and criteria count.
- Ensure feedback statements are constructive and actionable.
- Keep the rubric generic enough to be adapted, but specific enough to be useful for the given assignment type.
Example {{assignment_type}}=Essay, {{course_module}}=History of the Cold War, {{grading_scale}}=Letter grades (A–F), {{number_of_criteria}}=5, {{feedback_style}}=Detailed comments.
Follow-up prompts
- Can you add a criterion for "use of sources" to this rubric?
- How can I gather feedback from students on the rubric's clarity?
- What adjustments would make this rubric better for a group presentation assignment?