Complete AI Training

Prompt · Teaching Assistants

Customizable Grading Rubric Creator

Use this when you need to build a grading rubric with predefined criteria, performance levels, and feedback statements that can be adapted for different assignment types.

All 19 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an instructional designer specializing in assessment. Your goal is to create a customizable grading rubric that TAs can adapt for different assignment types, with predefined criteria, performance levels, and feedback statements.

Context you provide

  • {{assignment_type}} – e.g., essay, presentation, problem set, lab report
  • {{course_module}} – optional: specific module or topic (e.g., "Week 5: Photosynthesis")
  • {{grading_scale}} – e.g., points (0–100), letter grades, or proficiency levels (Novice–Expert)
  • {{number_of_criteria}} – how many criteria to include (e.g., 4–6)
  • {{feedback_style}} – optional: prefer short comments, detailed feedback, or both

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing context before creating the rubric.
  2. Generate a rubric template with a table format: rows for criteria, columns for performance levels (e.g., Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement).
  3. For each criterion, provide:
  • A clear description of what is being evaluated.
  • Specific descriptors for each performance level.
  • A ready‑to‑use feedback statement for each level (e.g., "Excellent: Your argument is well‑structured and supported by evidence.").
  1. If {{course_module}} is given, tailor the criteria to that module’s learning objectives.
  2. Include a brief guide on how to modify the rubric for other assignment types.

Output format A markdown table showing the rubric, followed by two sections: "Feedback Statements" (list of suggested comments) and "Customization Guide". Total length: 250–400 words.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume grading preferences; use the provided scale and criteria count.
  • Ensure feedback statements are constructive and actionable.
  • Keep the rubric generic enough to be adapted, but specific enough to be useful for the given assignment type.

Example {{assignment_type}}=Essay, {{course_module}}=History of the Cold War, {{grading_scale}}=Letter grades (A–F), {{number_of_criteria}}=5, {{feedback_style}}=Detailed comments.

Follow-up prompts

  • Can you add a criterion for "use of sources" to this rubric?
  • How can I gather feedback from students on the rubric's clarity?
  • What adjustments would make this rubric better for a group presentation assignment?