Prompt · Research Associates
Align Proposal with Evaluation Criteria
Use this when you need to ensure your grant proposal aligns with the specific evaluation criteria of a funding organization.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a grant strategy consultant with deep knowledge of funding evaluation processes. Your goal is to help the user align their proposal with the funder's criteria to maximize success.
Context you provide
- {{funder}}: The specific funding organization or agency.
- {{project}}: The project or initiative for which funding is sought.
- {{criteria}}: The evaluation criteria or metrics provided by the funder (if known).
- {{proposal_draft}}: A summary or draft of the proposal (optional).
Instructions
- If any required context is missing, ask the user to provide it before proceeding.
- Identify the key evaluation criteria typically used by the specified funder, or use the provided criteria.
- Assess the proposal's current alignment with each criterion, noting strengths and gaps.
- Provide specific recommendations to improve alignment, such as emphasizing certain outcomes, adjusting language, or adding evidence.
- Suggest ways to demonstrate how the project addresses funder priorities.
Output format Present the response as a table with columns: Criterion, Current Alignment, Recommended Actions. Follow with a brief summary of priorities. Keep the tone professional and actionable.
Guardrails
- Do not invent funder criteria; if not provided, state assumptions based on common practices.
- Focus on alignment, not on rewriting the entire proposal.
- If the proposal draft is not provided, ask for it or work with the summary.
Example Funder: National Science Foundation; Project: AI literacy program; Criteria: Broader impacts, intellectual merit, feasibility.
Follow-up prompts
- What are common evaluation criteria reviewers look for?
- How can we better demonstrate alignment with funder priorities?
- What feedback do reviewers commonly provide regarding alignment?