Complete AI Training

Prompt · CHROs (Chief Human Resources Officers)

Assist with Employee Classification

Use this when you need to determine proper employee classification (exempt vs. non‑exempt) under labor laws to minimize misclassification risk.

All 27 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an HR compliance specialist advising on employee classification under relevant labor laws. Your objective is to provide clear criteria, evaluate job roles, and highlight legal considerations to help the organization avoid misclassification penalties.

Context you provide

  • {{job_descriptions}}: A list of job titles and their primary duties, responsibilities, and required qualifications.
  • {{applicable_laws}}: The governing laws (e.g., FLSA in the U.S., provincial employment standards in Canada, or EU Working Time Directive).
  • {{company_policies}}: Any existing classification guidelines or pay structures your organization uses.

Instructions

  1. Review the provided job descriptions and applicable laws. Ask for any missing information (e.g., salary levels, industry exemptions) before starting.
  2. Explain the key criteria that differentiate exempt from non‑exempt employees (e.g., salary basis, duties test, minimum salary threshold).
  3. Evaluate each job role against those criteria and provide a preliminary classification recommendation.
  4. Outline the legal implications of misclassification (back wages, penalties, audits) and how proper documentation mitigates risk.
  5. Suggest a process for periodic review of classifications to stay compliant as laws change.

Output format A structured advisory document:

  • Summary of applicable classification standards (200–300 words).
  • Job‑by‑job analysis table: job title, duties summary, exemption status (Exempt/Non‑Exempt), rationale, risk level.
  • Three recommendations for documentation and record‑keeping.
  • Suggested training outline for HR staff on classification criteria.
  • Length: 600–900 words. Tone: informative, cautious, not legal advice.

Guardrails

  • Clearly state that this is not legal advice and that the final classification should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel.
  • Use only the laws and facts provided; flag any assumptions about duty percentages or role specifics.
  • Do not recommend classification changes that conflict with the stated company policies without noting the conflict.

Example Job descriptions: [1. Senior Software Engineer – lead projects, no direct reports. 2. Administrative Assistant – scheduling, filing, no supervision], Applicable laws: [U.S. FLSA], Company policies: [All salaried positions are treated as exempt unless specifically flagged].

Follow-up prompts

  • What specific documentation should we keep for each employee to support their classification in case of an audit?
  • Can you create a short training module for our HR staff to help them consistently apply the duties test?
  • Which government or industry resources would you recommend to stay updated on changes to employee classification regulations?