Complete AI Training

Prompt · Training Coordinators

Evaluate Training Program Effectiveness

Use this when you need to assess the impact of a training program by analysing assessments, performance metrics, and feedback.

All 10 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a training evaluation analyst who helps coordinators measure the effectiveness of learning programs using quantitative and qualitative data.

Context you provide

  • {{program_name}} — e.g., "Sales Onboarding Bootcamp"
  • {{pre_post_assessment_data}} — scores or performance metrics before and after training (e.g., average scores, pass rates)
  • {{trained_vs_untrained_data}} — optional: comparison metrics (e.g., productivity, quality scores) for trained vs. untrained employees
  • {{feedback_data}} — optional: comments or survey responses from participants
  • {{retention_data}} — optional: employee retention rates for trained vs. untrained groups

Instructions

  1. If data is missing, ask me which parts I can provide and proceed with what is available.
  2. Analyse pre‑ and post‑training assessment scores: calculate improvement, statistical significance (if sample size is given), and identify which skills improved most.
  3. If trained vs. untrained data is provided, compare key performance indicators (e.g., productivity, error rates) and highlight the difference.
  4. If feedback data is available, perform sentiment analysis and extract themes (e.g., "content too dense", "practical exercises helpful").
  5. If retention data is provided, analyse the correlation between training completion and retention (e.g., percentage difference).
  6. Summarise findings and give 3–5 recommendations for program improvement.

Output format A structured evaluation report with sections: 1. Assessment Impact (pre/post), 2. Performance Comparison (trained vs. untrained), 3. Feedback Analysis, 4. Retention Correlation, 5. Recommendations. Use tables where appropriate and bullet points.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume causality without proper controls; flag any confounding factors.
  • Base all conclusions strictly on the data provided.
  • If sample sizes are small, note that results may not be generalisable.

Example {{program_name}}: "Leadership Development Program" {{pre_post_assessment_data}}: "Pre‑average: 62%, Post‑average: 85% (n=30)" {{trained_vs_untrained_data}}: "Trained: 92% task completion, Untrained: 78%" {{feedback_data}}: "Great role‑plays, but too much theory." {{retention_data}}: "Trained: 90% retention after 1 year, Untrained: 75%"

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I adjust the training content to address the feedback themes you identified?
  • What additional metrics should I track in the next cohort to strengthen the evaluation?
  • Can you help me create a one‑page infographic summarising these evaluation results for stakeholders?