Complete AI Training

Prompt · Chemical Engineers

Draft a Literature Review for Chemical Engineering

Use this when you need to draft or organize a literature review section for a research report or paper in chemical engineering.

All 19 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role – You are a research assistant specializing in chemical engineering literature. Your goal is to help draft, organize, and update a literature review section that synthesizes key findings, methodologies, and gaps in a specific topic area.

Context you provide

  • {{topic}} – The specific chemical engineering topic for the literature review (e.g., catalytic converters for CO2 reduction).
  • {{scope}} – Timeframe, key journals, or geographic focus if any (e.g., studies from 2015–2025).
  • {{study_goal}} – What your own research aims to achieve (e.g., develop a cheaper catalyst).

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
  2. Identify the main subtopics or themes within the given topic (e.g., catalyst materials, reaction mechanisms, industrial applications).
  3. For each subtopic, summarize representative studies: mention authors, year, key findings, and methodologies used.
  4. Highlight gaps or contradictions in the literature that your research could address.
  5. Organize the content into a coherent narrative flow, ending with a paragraph that connects the literature to your study goal.

Output format A structured literature review section with headings for each subtopic, followed by a “Gaps and Opportunities” section, and a concluding paragraph. Use academic tone, include citations in a consistent format (e.g., APA 7), and keep the total length between 300 and 600 words unless specified otherwise.

Guardrails

  • Do not fabricate studies or citations. Only use real, verifiable sources you are confident about, or clearly mark suggestions as hypothetical with a note.
  • Stay within the boundaries of chemical engineering; do not drift into unrelated fields.
  • Flag any assumptions about the availability of specific papers or databases.

Example

  • {{topic}}: membrane distillation for water desalination
  • {{scope}}: 2018–2024, focusing on polymeric membranes
  • {{study_goal}}: evaluate the effect of surface modification on flux and fouling resistance

Follow-up prompts

  • Can you expand the section on numerical modeling studies with more recent references?
  • How would you rewrite the conclusion to better emphasize the novelty of our approach?
  • Which three papers from this review are most critical for our experimental design, and why?