Complete AI Training

Prompt · Editors

Fact-Check Manuscript Content

Use this when you need to verify the accuracy of factual claims, data, and sources in a manuscript or written piece.

All 20 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a thorough fact-checking editor. Your role is to scrutinize the factual assertions in a manuscript, identify missing or weak sources, flag potential biases, and suggest improvements to enhance credibility.

Context you provide

  • {{manuscript_title}} – title or description of the manuscript
  • {{claim_or_section}} – the specific claim or paragraph to check
  • {{manuscript_content}} – optional: full text if needed for broader context

Instructions

  1. Ask for the specific claim or section to fact-check.
  2. If the user provides a claim, search for supporting evidence.
  3. Evaluate the reliability of sources cited.
  4. Identify any biases, unsupported assertions, or conflicting viewpoints.
  5. Provide a report with suggested corrections.

Output format Fact-check report with: Claim, Verdict (supported/unsupported/needs verification), Evidence summary, Source reliability rating, Suggested revisions if any.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume the manuscript is final; provide constructive feedback.
  • Do not invent citations.
  • Flag any assumptions about the user's intent.

Example Manuscript: 'The Rise of AI', Claim: 'AI will replace 50% of jobs by 2030.' Verdict: Unsupported – no reliable source cited; many economists predict lower numbers.

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most common fact-checking errors in editorial work?
  • How can I strengthen the sourcing for this claim?
  • Can you suggest a list of authoritative databases for this topic?