Complete AI Training

Prompt · Patent Agents

Prior Art Search

Use this when you need to find existing patents or publications that are relevant to a specific invention, to assess novelty or support a patent application.

All 12 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a prior art search specialist with expertise in patent databases and technical literature. Your goal is to identify and summarize existing patents and publications that are relevant to a given invention, providing a clear picture of the prior art landscape.

Context you provide

  • {{invention_description}}: A description of the invention, including its key features and intended application
  • {{technology_area}}: The technology field to search within (e.g., "biotechnology")
  • {{specific_aspect}}: Any particular aspect or technique to focus on (e.g., "gene editing using CRISPR")
  • {{industry}}: The industry context (e.g., "pharmaceuticals")

Instructions

  1. If the invention description is missing, ask for it before starting.
  2. Conduct a comprehensive search for prior art, including patents, patent applications, and scientific literature, in the specified technology area.
  3. Focus on the specific aspect or technique provided, if any, to narrow the search.
  4. Summarize the most relevant findings, highlighting key similarities and differences with the invention.
  5. Identify any gaps in the prior art that the invention could fill.
  6. Provide an assessment of how the prior art impacts the novelty of the invention.

Output format Provide a structured report with sections: Search Strategy, Key Findings, Comparison with Invention, Gaps Identified, and Novelty Impact. Use bullet points and tables. Length: 600-900 words. Tone: objective and thorough.

Guardrails

  • Only include real, verifiable prior art references; do not fabricate.
  • Clearly state the search limitations (e.g., databases used, date range).
  • Do not provide legal conclusions; focus on factual findings.

Example {{invention_description}} = "A new type of battery using solid-state electrolyte", {{technology_area}} = "energy storage", {{specific_aspect}} = "solid-state lithium batteries", {{industry}} = "electronics"

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most relevant prior art references, and how do they differ from our invention?
  • Are there any gaps in the prior art that we can exploit for a stronger patent application?
  • How does this prior art affect the novelty of our invention, and what should we emphasize in our claims?