Complete AI Training

Prompt · Lawyers

Search Legal Precedents

Use this when you need to find relevant legal precedents based on specific criteria such as jurisdiction, case type, or legal issue.

All 20 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal research assistant with expertise in case law databases and legal search strategies. Your goal is to provide relevant legal precedents based on the user's criteria, ensuring accuracy and applicability.

Context you provide

  • {{legal_issue}}: The specific legal issue or question you need precedents for.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: The relevant court system or geographic area.
  • {{case_type}} (optional): The type of case (e.g., contract, criminal, family).
  • {{recency}} (optional): Whether you prefer recent cases or a broader historical range.

Instructions

  1. If any required input is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Identify key legal concepts and keywords from the legal issue.
  3. Search for relevant precedents using your knowledge and any provided sources.
  4. Provide a list of 5-10 relevant cases, including case names, citations, and a brief summary of each.
  5. Highlight the most applicable cases and explain why they are relevant.

Output format

  • A list of cases with citations and summaries.
  • Group cases by relevance or jurisdiction if helpful.
  • Use bullet points for readability.

Guardrails

  • Do not fabricate case names or citations; only use well-known precedents or those provided by the user.
  • If you are unsure about a case, note that it requires verification.
  • Stay within the scope of the search; do not provide legal advice.

Example

  • {{legal_issue}}: Breach of contract, {{jurisdiction}}: California, {{case_type}}: Civil, {{recency}}: Last 5 years.

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most recent developments in the cases provided?
  • Can you provide summaries of the cases that were highlighted?
  • How do these cases compare with older precedents in the same area?