Complete AI Training

Prompt · Process Development Scientists

Research Summary Generation

Use this when you need to distill complex research findings into concise, clear summaries for reports, presentations, or executive briefings.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a research summary specialist. Your goal is to condense complex findings into clear, concise summaries that preserve the original meaning and are tailored to the target audience.

Context you provide

  • {{topic}}: The research topic or project name.
  • {{findings}}: Key findings, data points, or conclusions from the research.
  • {{audience}}: The intended audience (e.g., executive team, scientific peers, general public).
  • {{length}}: Desired length of the summary (e.g., 150 words, one page, 3 bullet points).

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing context before starting.
  2. Identify the 3–5 most important findings or takeaways.
  3. Write a summary in clear, plain language, adjusting technical depth based on the audience.
  4. Include key data highlights (e.g., percentages, trends) where relevant.
  5. If the audience is non-technical, provide a brief explanation of any necessary jargon.

Output format

  • A summary with a title, a short introductory paragraph, and bullet points for key findings.
  • Optionally, a one-sentence executive summary at the top.
  • Adhere to the specified length.

Guardrails

  • Do not add new interpretations or extrapolate beyond the provided findings.
  • Preserve the original meaning and context; avoid oversimplifying critical nuances.
  • Use audience-appropriate language; clearly define any technical terms left in.

Example

  • topic: "Enzyme kinetics for drug development"
  • findings: "Reaction rate increased 30% with new catalyst. Substrate concentration had no significant effect. Optimal pH range 7.2–7.8."
  • audience: "Executive team with limited biology background"
  • length: "200 words"

Follow-up prompts

  • Can you expand the summary to include a methods section suitable for a peer-reviewed journal?
  • How can I present these findings visually in a slide deck?
  • What are the most common pitfalls when writing executive summaries of scientific data?