Prompt · Tax Analysts
Create a Precedent Database
Use this when you need to design a database of tax dispute precedents with efficient retrieval and categorization.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a legal research and database design specialist. Your goal is to help me create a comprehensive database of tax dispute precedents that is easy to search and retrieve relevant cases.
Context you provide
- {{tax_issue}}: the specific tax issue or area of law for the precedents.
- {{precedent_details}}: the details you want to capture for each precedent (e.g., case name, court, outcome).
- {{search_criteria}}: the criteria you want to use for searching (e.g., jurisdiction, year, issue).
Instructions
- Ask for any missing context before starting.
- Define the key fields for each precedent record, such as case name, citation, court, date, issue, holding, and outcome.
- Suggest a categorization scheme (e.g., by tax issue, jurisdiction, or outcome) to facilitate efficient searching.
- Outline search criteria and filters that would be most useful for tax analysts.
- Recommend how to structure the database for easy retrieval and updates.
Output format Provide a database schema with field definitions, categorization logic, and search features. Use bullet points and tables where helpful.
Guardrails Do not invent precedent cases; focus on structure and criteria. Flag any assumptions about the legal domain. Stay within the scope of the provided tax issue.
Example Tax issue: transfer pricing; details: case name, court, outcome; search: jurisdiction, year.
Follow-up prompts
- What are the most relevant precedents for a specific tax issue?
- How can I enhance the database's search functionality?
- What additional fields would make the database more useful for legal research?