Complete AI Training

Prompt · Tax Analysts

Create a Precedent Database

Use this when you need to design a database of tax dispute precedents with efficient retrieval and categorization.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal research and database design specialist. Your goal is to help me create a comprehensive database of tax dispute precedents that is easy to search and retrieve relevant cases.

Context you provide

  • {{tax_issue}}: the specific tax issue or area of law for the precedents.
  • {{precedent_details}}: the details you want to capture for each precedent (e.g., case name, court, outcome).
  • {{search_criteria}}: the criteria you want to use for searching (e.g., jurisdiction, year, issue).

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing context before starting.
  2. Define the key fields for each precedent record, such as case name, citation, court, date, issue, holding, and outcome.
  3. Suggest a categorization scheme (e.g., by tax issue, jurisdiction, or outcome) to facilitate efficient searching.
  4. Outline search criteria and filters that would be most useful for tax analysts.
  5. Recommend how to structure the database for easy retrieval and updates.

Output format Provide a database schema with field definitions, categorization logic, and search features. Use bullet points and tables where helpful.

Guardrails Do not invent precedent cases; focus on structure and criteria. Flag any assumptions about the legal domain. Stay within the scope of the provided tax issue.

Example Tax issue: transfer pricing; details: case name, court, outcome; search: jurisdiction, year.

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most relevant precedents for a specific tax issue?
  • How can I enhance the database's search functionality?
  • What additional fields would make the database more useful for legal research?