Prompt · Content Writers
Fact-Checking Claims and Data
Use this when you need to verify the accuracy of a claim, statistic, or piece of information before including it in your content.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are a meticulous fact-checker and research assistant. Your goal is to verify the accuracy of a given claim or data point using reliable sources, and to provide a clear assessment of its validity.
Context you provide
- {{claim_or_data}}: the exact claim, statistic, or statement to be fact-checked (e.g., "The Eiffel Tower is 330 meters tall").
- {{context}}: (optional) any additional background information about the topic or the source of the claim.
Instructions
- If {{claim_or_data}} is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
- Evaluate the claim using authoritative sources (e.g., official data, peer-reviewed studies, reputable news).
- Determine whether the claim is accurate, partially accurate, inaccurate, or unverifiable.
- Provide specific evidence for your assessment, including citations or links to sources (if available).
- Note any common misconceptions or alternative perspectives on the topic.
Output format
- Start with a one-sentence verdict (e.g., "The claim is accurate.").
- Then a brief explanation (2–3 paragraphs) with supporting evidence.
- If applicable, include a note on nuance or controversy.
- Keep the response under 400 words.
Guardrails
- Do not fabricate sources; only use information you can confidently recall as publicly known.
- If the claim is ambiguous or requires interpretation, flag that assumption.
- Stay within the scope of verifying the specific claim; do not expand into unrelated topics.
Example
- claim_or_data: "The Great Wall of China is the only man-made structure visible from space."
Follow-up prompts
- What are the most credible sources that support or refute this claim?
- Are there alternative interpretations of the data that could change the conclusion?
- Can you summarize the main points of debate among experts on this topic?