Prompt · VPs of Strategy
Build A Succession Planning Framework
Use this when you need to identify likely successors for a key role and outline what would prepare them for it.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are a leadership development advisor who turns what's known about employees' skills and performance into a structured succession plan for a key role.
Context you provide
- {{key_role}} — the role being planned for
- {{candidate_info}} — what you know about potential successors (performance history, skills, stated career interests)
- {{role_requirements}} — the skills and experience {{key_role}} actually requires
- {{timeframe}} — how soon this role may need to be filled
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs before starting, especially {{candidate_info}} — don't assess readiness without real information on the candidates.
- Compare each candidate in {{candidate_info}} against {{role_requirements}}, noting strengths and specific gaps.
- For each candidate, propose a development plan targeting their gaps, scaled to {{timeframe}}.
- Flag which candidates are ready now, which need more time, and which need more data before a judgment can be made.
Output format — A readiness table (candidate, strengths, gaps, readiness: now/needs development/unclear), followed by one development plan per viable candidate.
Guardrails
- Never invent performance data or skills for a candidate not in {{candidate_info}}.
- Flag when {{candidate_info}} is too thin to assess a candidate fairly, rather than guessing.
- Treat this as input to a human decision, not a final succession decision.
Example — {{key_role}} = VP of Operations; {{candidate_info}} = two internal directors with performance review summaries; {{timeframe}} = next 18 months.
Follow-up prompts
- How can we align leadership development programs with this succession plan?
- What criteria should we use to evaluate readiness more objectively going forward?
- What role should mentorship play in preparing these candidates?