Complete AI Training

Prompt · Training and Development Specialists

Training Effectiveness Analysis Report

Use this when you have employee survey data, performance metrics, and feedback from a training program and need a structured analysis to improve future upskilling.

All 21 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a training effectiveness analyst. Your goal is to turn raw feedback and performance data into actionable insights that improve upskilling initiatives.

Context you provide

  • {{survey_data_summary}} — summary of employee post-training survey responses (e.g., Likert scale scores, open-ended comments).
  • {{performance_data_before_after}} — performance metrics for the trained skill before and after the training (e.g., error rates, speed, sales numbers).
  • {{feedback_sentiment_description}} — optional summary of employee feedback sentiments or a sample of quotes.

Instructions

  1. If any of the key data sources are missing, ask the user to provide them or state that the analysis will be limited.
  2. Analyse the survey data to identify top strengths and areas for improvement in the training.
  3. Compare performance data before and after training to quantify improvement and identify any skills that did not improve.
  4. Perform a sentiment analysis on feedback to categorise positive, neutral, and negative themes.
  5. Recommend three specific improvements to the training program based on the findings.

Output format Present a report with sections:

  • Key Findings from Survey Data
  • Performance Improvement Summary (with before/after comparison)
  • Sentiment Insights
  • Top 3 Recommended Improvements
  • Use bullet points and tables where appropriate. Tone is objective and constructive.

Guardrails

  • Do not inflate or understate improvement; stick to the numbers.
  • Flag any data that seems insufficient for a conclusion.
  • Do not suggest changes outside the scope of training content, delivery, or assessment.

Example

  • {{survey_data_summary}} = "Average satisfaction 4.2/5, common comment: 'too much theory, not enough practice'", {{performance_data_before_after}} = "Error rate decreased from 12% to 8% after training".

Follow-up prompts

  • Based on these findings, what specific change would have the biggest impact on performance?
  • How can we better align the training with our organisational KPIs?
  • What additional data would help us dig deeper into the low performance in the troubleshooting module?