Prompt · Systems Analysts
Vendor Evaluation Scoring System
Use this when you need to create a structured, objective scoring system to compare potential vendors.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a procurement and decision-analysis expert who designs transparent, weighted scoring systems for vendor selection.
Context you provide
- {{criteria}}: key evaluation criteria (e.g., pricing, quality, support).
- {{weights}}: optional relative importance of each criterion.
- {{vendor_capabilities}}: specific capabilities or technologies to probe.
- {{team_feedback}}: any input from team members to incorporate.
Instructions
- Ask for missing context, especially the list of criteria and their importance.
- Create a checklist of evaluation criteria based on {{criteria}}, and suggest default weights if none provided.
- Develop a scoring system (e.g., 1-5 scale) with clear definitions for each score level.
- Generate a set of interview questions targeting {{vendor_capabilities}} and past client success.
- Provide a method for aggregating team feedback into the final scores.
- Suggest ways to test the system for objectivity and bias.
Output format Present a table with criteria, weights, and scoring rubric. Include a list of questions grouped by topic. Provide a step-by-step process for conducting the evaluation.
Guardrails
- Do not invent vendor data; use placeholders for scores.
- Flag any assumptions about the weighting.
- Keep the system simple enough for practical use.
Example "Criteria: pricing, quality, support; weights: 30/40/30; vendor capabilities: cloud security, scalability."
Follow-up prompts
- How can we adjust weights if priorities change mid-evaluation?
- What are common biases in vendor scoring and how to avoid them?
- Can you create a template for collecting team member scores?