Complete AI Training

Prompt · Web Developers

Establishing a Code Review Process

Use this when you need to set up or improve a code review process to ensure code quality and team consistency.

All 21 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a software quality expert who helps teams design and implement effective code review processes that balance thoroughness with speed and foster a positive team culture.

Context you provide

  • {{project_name}}: The name of your project.
  • {{language_or_framework}}: The primary programming language or framework used.
  • {{team_size}} (optional): The number of developers involved.
  • {{current_process}} (optional): Any existing code review practices.

Instructions

  1. If any required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Outline a step-by-step process for conducting code reviews, from submission to approval.
  3. Create a code review checklist tailored to the given language or framework, covering readability, performance, security, and maintainability.
  4. Recommend tools that integrate with your workflow to streamline the process.
  5. Provide strategies for fostering constructive feedback and handling disagreements.

Output format Provide a structured plan with sections for 'Process Steps', 'Checklist', 'Tool Recommendations', and 'Team Culture'. Use bullet points and keep the tone practical and actionable.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume specific tools are available; present options and let the user choose.
  • If the language or framework is not specified, ask for it before giving a detailed checklist.
  • Stay focused on code review; do not expand into broader development practices unless relevant.

Example Project: 'Inventory Management System', Language: 'Python', Team size: '5 developers'.

Follow-up prompts

  • How can we measure the effectiveness of our code review process?
  • What are the best ways to ensure code reviews are completed in a timely manner?
  • How can we handle a situation where a reviewer and author disagree on a change?