Creative revision reconciler

For small design agency producers, turn design versions and authorized feedback into approved revision brief. Address this specific problem: client feedback conflicts across email and annotated files. The aim: resolve contradictory feedback before designers redo work. The pilot tests whether that benefit holds up against reviewer effort and real operating costs.

The buyer creates a project, supplies design versions and authorized feedback, and confirms scope and access. Users correct extracted facts, resolve flagged uncertainties and approve the final approved revision brief before use. Retain source links and a version history for the next cycle.

How the AI works

Cluster comments while the producer decides creative priorities. Keep model suggestions separate from verified facts. Link factual outputs to authorized input evidence and show missing information explicitly. Use deterministic checks for counts, dates, identifiers and arithmetic where applicable. A designated reviewer validates consequential outputs and signs off the delivered result.

Safeguards

Protect supplied asset rights, client approvals and product fidelity. Do not reuse private client assets across accounts. One project and PDF feedback imports. Require appropriate access and publication approval. Preserve source material, label AI drafts and make corrections traceable. Measure false positives and missed cases alongside speed.

What to build first

Costed pilot: One project and PDF feedback imports. Start with one buyer organization and a bounded set of representative inputs. Implement the first two modules: align comments to versions; cluster repeated requests. Support the third task through an assisted review queue: detect conflicting directions. Handle the remaining required functions manually until validated. Include input upload, source references, user correction, a reviewer approval step and export of approved revision brief. Authentication, account isolation, deletion controls and basic operational logging are included. Specialized production certification, live write integrations and broader rollout are not included unless explicitly stated.

What it can connect to

Existing artwork, campaign systems and client approval processes. Calendars, email, task managers and relevant business records. Use draft actions and supervised handoffs first, then enable only specifically authorized writes. Begin with uploads and exports of design versions and authorized feedback. Any named system or connector is a candidate requiring current access and compatibility checks; no live connection is included by default.

The screens in detail

Use a queue or timeline as the opening view, with clear owners, dates and current states. Each case opens into its source context, proposed actions and discussion. Give external participants a limited form or status page. Make the next required action visible without opening every record. Open with version stack; move into conflict board for the detailed task; finish in approval log for review and handoff. Show the source record, uncertainty and approval status beside each proposed output.