Complete AI Training

AI app for customer support · no coding needed

Repair-versus-replace service calculator

Reduce resolution cost while honoring approved customer rights.

Made for: Appliance customer-care operations

What Repair-versus-replace service calculator looks like
Open the demo For members · a working demo with sample data

What it does for you

The problem

Agents cannot compare commercially allowed remedies consistently.

What it gives you

Staff-approved remedy comparison

What you give it

Approved remedy rulessupplied repair costs

How it works, step by step

  1. Calculate eligible scenario costs
  2. Include logistics and downtime assumptions
  3. Route exceptions for approval
  4. Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions
  5. Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use
  6. Export a versioned staff-approved remedy comparison with source references and unresolved questions

Build it yourself with your AI system

Build this app yourself, no coding needed

Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.

Sign in to see how to build it yourself

Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Repair-versus-replace service calculator with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.

Sign in Become a member

4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks

Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Repair-versus-replace service calculator with you.

Have Nexibeo build it

What's in the app pack

Included in the Complete AI Training membership.

  • The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
  • The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
  • A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
  • A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs

Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in

The files, for the technically curious
  • START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
  • README.mdOverview and links1 KB
  • questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
  • prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare27 KB
  • prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)27 KB
  • spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria15 KB
  • demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data198 KB

Questions

Do I need to know how to code?

No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.

What does it cost?

The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.

How long does it take?

The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.

Can I change it to fit my business?

Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.

More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first

Reduce resolution cost while honoring approved customer rights

Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect approved remedy rules and supplied repair costs, then follow this sequence: 1. Calculate eligible scenario costs. 2. Include logistics and downtime assumptions. 3. Route exceptions for approval. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve staff-approved remedy comparison, and measure verified remedy cost difference minus review and logistics overhead against a documented baseline.

How the AI works

Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. One product family; staff determine eligibility and customer commitments. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.

Safeguards

Keep customer account access scoped. Escalate missing evidence and consequential exceptions to staff. Review quality alongside any speed measure. One product family; staff determine eligibility and customer commitments. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.

What to build first

Pilot scope: One product family; staff determine eligibility and customer commitments. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: calculate eligible scenario costs; include logistics and downtime assumptions. Support the third module with operator review: route exceptions for approval. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.

What it can connect to

Support inboxes, help centers, order records and customer feedback systems. Read-only operational exports, calendars and finance or inventory records as relevant. Start with plan exports and retain human approval for execution. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.

The screens in detail

Primary screens: Constraint and input setup, Scenario comparison, Decision and pilot tracker. Place editable drivers and constraints beside a clearly labeled scenario output. Include a baseline view, comparison chart or schedule, and an assumptions history. Let users trace a proposed quantity or date back to its inputs. Keep forecasts distinct from actual results. Make the task-specific outcome staff-approved remedy comparison visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.