AI app for education · no coding needed
Student-authored practice question cooperative
Turn supervised question writing into reusable learning resources.
Made for: Educators running original practice-resource programs
What it does for you
The problem
Producing varied reviewed questions consumes scarce teaching time.
What it gives you
Educator-approved original practice bank
What you give it
Student-owned original questionseducator-approved rubrics
How it works, step by step
- Coach question clarity
- Route pedagogical peer and teacher review
- License approved practice collections
- Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions
- Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use
- Export a versioned educator-approved original practice bank with source references and unresolved questions
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Student-authored practice question cooperative with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Student-authored practice question cooperative with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare26 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)26 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria13 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data195 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
Turn supervised question writing into reusable learning resources
Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect student-owned original questions and educator-approved rubrics, then follow this sequence: 1. Coach question clarity. 2. Route pedagogical peer and teacher review. 3. License approved practice collections. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve educator-approved original practice bank, and measure accepted useful questions per teacher review hour and learning-task outcomes against a documented baseline.
How the AI works
Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. Original authorized material only; no leaked exams or automatic grading decisions. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.
Safeguards
Use educator-reviewed content and answer keys. Apply appropriate access and consent for learner records and distinguish completion from demonstrated learning. Original authorized material only; no leaked exams or automatic grading decisions. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.
What to build first
Pilot scope: Original authorized material only; no leaked exams or automatic grading decisions. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: coach question clarity; route pedagogical peer and teacher review. Support the third module with operator review: license approved practice collections. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.
What it can connect to
Learning resources, course portals and educator review processes. Permitted opportunity feeds, customer profiles, calendars and CRM exports. Keep initial outreach or applications as user-reviewed drafts. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.
The screens in detail
Primary screens: Verified offer or need profiles, Explainable match comparison, Mutual approval and handoff. Open with a filterable opportunity feed and clear fit explanations. Each profile shows source evidence, eligibility conditions and missing information. Keep saved, rejected and needs-review states. Include a deadline or next-action view without hiding the basis of recommendations. Make the task-specific outcome educator-approved original practice bank visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.
