AI app for pr and communications · no coding needed
Public statement evidence checker
Claim-level review that exposes the evidence behind public wording.
Made for: Communications teams publishing factual statements
What it does for you
The problem
Unsupported claims survive normal copy editing.
What it gives you
Statement evidence verification report
What you give it
Draft statementsapproved evidence sources
How it works, step by step
- Extract factual claims
- Locate supplied evidence
- Flag overstatement
- Check dates and quantities
- Distinguish opinion
- Record reviewer decisions
What you see on screen
- Claim list
- supporting passages
- reviewer verdict
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Public statement evidence checker with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Public statement evidence checker with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare21 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)21 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria11 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data194 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
For communications teams publishing factual statements, turn draft statements and approved evidence sources into statement evidence verification report. Address the recurring problem: unsupported claims survive normal copy editing. The pilot measures confirmed unsupported claims and false alarms against the buyer's current method, before the larger build.
Agree review criteria, ingest a sample, generate candidate findings, inspect supporting evidence, let reviewers confirm or dismiss each item, assign corrections, and recheck the affected material. Start with draft statements and approved evidence sources and finish with statement evidence verification report.
How the AI works
Propose possible inconsistencies, omissions and rubric matches. Combine extraction with deterministic checks where rules are explicit. Reviewers make the final judgment. Keep false positives and missed cases visible during evaluation.
Safeguards
Verify public facts and quotations. Keep publication authority explicit and preserve the original context behind media and reputation findings. Validate source access and reviewer availability during the pilot. Maintain customer-level access, data deletion controls and a record of final approvals.
What to build first
Begin with communications teams publishing factual statements and one recurring use case. Build the first two modules: extract factual claims; locate supplied evidence. Provide operator assistance for the third module: flag overstatement. Deliver statement evidence verification report through a manual review queue. Perform other necessary full-scope functions manually during the pilot. Include all applicable access, accuracy and professional-review controls from the start.
What it can connect to
Approved company facts, permitted media sources and publication workflows. Source repositories, task trackers and report exports. Keep findings as review proposals until authorized owners accept the resulting actions. These are candidate integration categories, not verified supported connectors.
The screens in detail
Open on a review queue ordered by reviewer-selected priorities. Show each finding beside the original evidence and applicable rule. Provide accept, dismiss and needs-information controls with reasons. A separate report view summarizes confirmed findings and unresolved items, not raw AI flags. In this product, the first view is claim list, followed by supporting passages and reviewer verdict.
