AI app for writers · no coding needed
Writing commission boundary planner
Expose research and approval dependencies before quoting.
Made for: Freelance writers handling complex assignments

What it does for you
The problem
Commissions omit research access and approval responsibilities.
What it gives you
Writer-client approved commission brief
What you give it
Client briefswriter-approved service terms
How it works, step by step
- Extract deliverables
- Identify source access needs
- Map reviewer roles
- Flag revision ambiguity
- Draft clarification questions
- Export agreed briefs
What you see on screen
- Commission canvas
- Research dependencies
- Scope approval
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Writing commission boundary planner with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Writing commission boundary planner with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build2 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare21 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)21 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria10 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data203 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
For freelance writers handling complex assignments, turn client briefs and writer-approved service terms into writer-client approved commission brief. Address this specific problem: commissions omit research access and approval responsibilities. The aim: expose research and approval dependencies before quoting. The pilot tests whether that benefit holds up against reviewer effort and real operating costs.
The buyer creates a project, supplies client briefs and writer-approved service terms, and confirms scope and access. Users correct extracted facts, resolve flagged uncertainties and approve the final writer-client approved commission brief before use. Retain source links and a version history for the next cycle.
How the AI works
Identify ambiguity without accepting client commitments. Keep model suggestions separate from verified facts. Link factual outputs to authorized input evidence and show missing information explicitly. Use deterministic checks for counts, dates, identifiers and arithmetic where applicable. A designated reviewer validates consequential outputs and signs off the delivered result.
Safeguards
Preserve author voice, source attribution, quotation accuracy and usage permissions. Authors approve substantive changes and publication scope. Scope preparation; contract legal review excluded. Require appropriate access and publication approval. Preserve source material, label AI drafts and make corrections traceable. Measure false positives and missed cases alongside speed.
What to build first
Costed pilot: Scope preparation; contract legal review excluded. Start with one buyer organization and a bounded set of representative inputs. Implement the first two modules: extract deliverables; identify source access needs. Support the third task through an assisted review queue: map reviewer roles. Handle the remaining required functions manually until validated. Include input upload, source references, user correction, a reviewer approval step and export of writer-client approved commission brief. Authentication, account isolation, deletion controls and basic operational logging are included. Specialized production certification, live write integrations and broader rollout are not included unless explicitly stated.
What it can connect to
Author-owned manuscripts, authorized interviews and permitted research sources. Case management, customer records, document storage and notification systems. Begin with an exportable review pack before automating destination writes. Begin with uploads and exports of client briefs and writer-approved service terms. Any named system or connector is a candidate requiring current access and compatibility checks; no live connection is included by default.
The screens in detail
Give submitters a mobile-friendly step-by-step form with document uploads and a visible completeness checklist. Staff see a queue with missing items and extracted fields. Place the original document beside each uncertain value. Show submitted, clarification required and ready-for-review states. Open with commission canvas; move into research dependencies for the detailed task; finish in scope approval for review and handoff. Show the source record, uncertainty and approval status beside each proposed output.





