AI Lies and Copyright Fears Spark Government Showdown with Artists

Technology Secretary Addresses AI and Copyright Controversy

The UK Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle, openly acknowledged that artificial intelligence “does lie” and admitted the technology is “not flawless.” Despite these shortcomings, he defended the Government’s current stance on copyright protections amid growing concerns over tech companies using artists’ work to train AI models.

Kyle emphasized the Government’s commitment to protecting artists’ rights, assuring that it will “never sell downstream” those rights. However, he also admitted to having “mistakenly” presented his preferred approach to AI and copyright, which involved requiring rights-holders to “opt out” if they did not want their work used by tech firms. Since then, he has reconsidered this position and is “going back to the drawing board”.

Creative Industry Backlash

Ministers are facing significant pushback from leading figures in the creative sector. Sir Elton John described the issue as an “existential” threat to artists. The Government remains in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has pushed for immediate copyright protections as part of amendments to the Data (Use and Access) Bill.

The House of Lords seeks to introduce transparency measures so rights-holders can track when and by whom their work is used. This would add a layer of accountability that creatives argue is essential when AI systems train on their material.

Balancing AI Development and Copyright Law

Regarding AI’s potential to generate inaccurate or misleading information, Kyle stated, “people need to understand that AI is not flawless, and that AI does lie because it’s based on human characteristics.” He noted that AI is becoming more precise and powerful but stressed the importance of using it wisely by understanding its limitations.

The Government plans to legislate on AI while simultaneously updating copyright laws. It intends to take a comprehensive approach, reviewing over 11,500 responses to its AI impact consultation before introducing any changes to avoid “piecemeal” legislation.

Controversial Opt-Out Proposal

One proposal under discussion would allow tech companies free access to British creative works—music, films, books—for AI training without requiring permission or payment. Artists would have to opt out if they did not want their work included.

Kyle clarified his position on this opt-out clause during a BBC interview, saying, “I always had on the table from the outset an opt-out clause.” However, he admitted this option was emphasized more than some creatives preferred. He reassured that he is listening to concerns and reconsidering the Government’s approach.

Artists Unite for Stronger Protections

Last month, hundreds of prominent artists, including Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney, and Kate Bush, signed a letter urging the Prime Minister to implement robust safeguards against unauthorized use of their work in AI training.

As the Government reviews feedback and prepares future legislation, the creative industries continue to press for clear, enforceable protections to ensure artists receive fair treatment and recognition in the AI era.

For government officials seeking to better understand AI’s impact and policy considerations, exploring comprehensive AI training resources can provide valuable insights and support informed decision-making. Visit Complete AI Training for courses and updates on AI governance and technology.