The Alabama State Bar has issued new guidelines that prohibit lawyers from billing clients for hours saved by using artificial intelligence, while allowing them to charge for time spent reviewing and correcting AI-generated work. The rules, released July 27, 2026, address growing concerns about ethical billing and professional responsibility as generative AI becomes more common in legal practice.
The recommendations do not create new ethical duties but clarify how existing rules apply to AI tools. Confidentiality obligations and the requirement for reasonable fees now extend to AI use, according to the State Bar.
"As emphasized by the American Bar Association, lawyers remain fully responsible for work performed on behalf of clients, regardless of whether AI tools were used in its creation," the State Bar said.
What the billing rules mean
Lawyers may bill for the time they spend reviewing, correcting, and applying professional judgment to AI-generated results. However, they cannot bill for the time that would have been spent if the technology did not exist. The guidelines state bluntly: "Efficiency does not justify inflated bills."
Citation verification and court sanctions
The State Bar also requires lawyers to independently verify all legal citations produced by AI using a "comparable authoritative legal database" before submitting documents to a court. This follows a series of sanctions in Alabama courts over fabricated citations. Last year, a federal judge sanctioned a partner at the law firm Butler Snow for including fake citations in two court documents. In April, the Alabama Supreme Court rejected an appeal and sanctioned an attorney who submitted documents citing non-existent cases generated by AI.
Protecting client confidentiality
Inputting client information into AI systems may pose risks to attorney-client privilege, the State Bar warned. Courts have not yet uniformly regulated this area. The guidelines advise lawyers to use corporate or closed AI systems rather than free platform versions, which may have weaker data protection. Legal professionals seeking to understand these obligations can explore AI for Legal Professionals Courses.
Why this matters for legal professionals
The Alabama guidelines offer a concrete framework for integrating AI without violating ethical duties. For lawyers, the message is clear: AI can assist with drafting and research, but it cannot replace the professional judgment that justifies a bill. Billing only for actual review time, not hypothetical savings, aligns with the profession's duty of candor. Firms that ignore these standards risk sanctions, client disputes, and damage to their reputation.
Your membership also unlocks:
