New Jersey has ordered DataOne, operator of one of the East Coast's largest planned data centers, to pay a $1.1 million fine for operating 62 gas generators without required air permits. The penalty - the largest ever imposed on a data center in the state - follows a drone investigation that captured thermal imagery of the unpermitted equipment running at a site powering Microsoft's AI tools.
The generators, some with capacities 50 times higher than the state's 37-kilowatt permit threshold, were emitting nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and other combustion-related pollutants, according to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Those emissions can worsen asthma, trigger heart attacks, and cause early deaths.
Thermal drone footage exposed the violations
In August, an investigation by The Guardian and Floodlight News shared aerial thermal images showing 45 of the 62 gas generators actively operating. The "tractor-trailer-size" units were "impossible to miss" when state inspectors finally visited the 2.6 million-square-foot Vineland complex in July, the New York Times reported. Those generators had not been present during the inspectors' previous visit in December 2024.
DataOne had previously attempted to secure permits for about 30 gas generators, but withdrew its application in May after the DEP found multiple deficiencies. Maintenance logs later showed the company had been running the generators since at least October, Floodlight reported. The company now has 45 days to apply for permits or cease operations - though it can continue running the engines while seeking approval.
DEP Commissioner Ed Potosnak said the enforcement action was "by far the largest ever taken against a data center in New Jersey" and vowed that data centers would not be "constructed or operated with impunity in this state."
Residents call the fine "pocket change"
Nichole Gardner, co-chair of local environmental nonprofit Sustain SJ, told Ars that the penalty is "insufficient, both in dollar amount and enforcement." She argued the site should halt operations during the 45-day permit window. Tiffany Leone-Vespa, an 18-year Vineland resident, echoed the frustration. "What's $1.07 million? They should have done it for each generator they were running, illegally. They're billionaires. It's like pocket change."
Steve Brown, another longtime resident, described the company's approach as a "'don't ask for permission, just ask for forgiveness later' kind of deal" that wouldn't deter similar conduct. Leone-Vespa raised unresolved questions about air monitoring: "What have we been breathing in since they've been running these generators without permits? What emissions were released? What's the air quality surrounding this neighborhood? Has it ever been measured?"
A DataOne spokesperson said the company "disagreed" with the fine but would apply for the permits, adding that the site is "transitioning to low-emission, quiet fuel cells." The statement did not address residents' demands for immediate operational changes.
A pattern of secrecy and community pushback
The project has drawn scrutiny since its announcement in March 2024. Construction moved quickly before the public grasped the data center's scale, South Jersey Climate News reported. Backlash intensified when Vineland's mayor and council proposed a $6.2 million loan to DataOne - an offer the company ultimately rejected - and residents began filing noise complaints that led to a federal lawsuit and multiple public health violations.
Zac Landicini, who founded Sustain SJ, said a farmer first spotted unusual equipment on satellite imagery while photographing a neighboring golf course. He raised the issue at a public town hall in February, but state and local enforcement didn't materialize for six months. Gardner said the delay fits a pattern: "The state and local government consistently prioritize the interests of these companies over the well-being of the community."
New Jersey recently passed a law ending data center tax credits, blocking developers from a fund that previously offered $250 million in incentives. More than 80 data centers are planned or under construction in the state. Sustain SJ is now advocating for a statewide moratorium on new projects until transparency and community input requirements are strengthened.
Why this matters for government, real estate, and construction professionals
This case signals that state environmental agencies are willing to levy seven-figure penalties for unpermitted data center operations - but the 45-day compliance window without a shutdown order also reveals the limits of current enforcement tools. For real estate developers and construction firms, the Vineland project underscores the legal and reputational risks of deploying backup power infrastructure before securing air permits, particularly in jurisdictions where community opposition is organized and politically active. Municipal officials should note that public loan proposals for private data center projects can trigger swift backlash, as Vineland's experience demonstrates.
Your membership also unlocks: