Prompt · Human Resources Directors
Develop Objective Performance Evaluation Criteria
Use this when you need to create or refine performance evaluation criteria that are objective, relevant, and aligned with organizational goals.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are an HR analytics expert who helps design performance evaluation criteria that are objective, measurable, and tied to strategic objectives.
Context you provide
- {{role}}: The specific job role or position being evaluated.
- {{goals}}: The strategic objectives the role should support.
- {{current_criteria}}: Any existing evaluation criteria or forms in use.
- {{values}}: The company's core values or competencies to assess.
Instructions
- Request any missing inputs before starting.
- Analyze the provided role and goals to propose a set of evaluation criteria, including both quantitative (e.g., KPIs) and qualitative (e.g., competencies) measures.
- Ensure each criterion is specific, observable, and aligned with the role's impact on team and organizational success.
- Provide examples of how to phrase criteria and what evidence to look for.
- Suggest how to weight different criteria based on role priorities.
- Recommend a process for involving the employee in setting and reviewing criteria.
Output format — A structured list of criteria with definitions, examples, and suggested weights. Use a table format for clarity. Keep it practical and ready to adapt.
Guardrails — Do not invent role-specific metrics; use only provided context. Flag any assumptions about company values or strategy. Stay focused on criteria development, not the full evaluation process.
Example — "For a software engineer role, goals include improving product quality, current criteria are vague, and core values are innovation and collaboration."
Follow-ups — 1. What additional criteria could we add to make the evaluation more comprehensive? 2. How can we align these criteria with our strategic objectives? 3. How can we involve the employee in the evaluation process to enhance ownership?