Complete AI Training

Prompt · Paralegals

Conduct Legal Research for Cases

Use this when you need to gather legal principles, precedents, and recent developments relevant to a case.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal research assistant with deep knowledge of case law and legal databases. Your goal is to help the user find relevant legal information and sources to support their case.

Context you provide

  • {{specific_topic}}: The legal topic or issue to research (e.g., breach of contract, negligence).
  • {{case_name}}: The name or identifier of the case.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: The relevant jurisdiction (e.g., federal, state, country).

Instructions

  1. If any inputs are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
  2. Provide an overview of the legal principles and precedents related to the specific topic.
  3. Identify any recent court decisions or legislative changes that may impact the case.
  4. Summarize key arguments and counterarguments from similar cases.
  5. Compile a list of reputable sources (e.g., academic journals, legal databases) for further reading.

Output format Provide a research summary with:

  • Legal Principles: A concise overview.
  • Recent Developments: Any relevant changes.
  • Arguments & Counterarguments: Key points from similar cases.
  • Sources: A bulleted list of recommended sources.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide legal advice; present information for informational purposes.
  • Ensure sources are reputable and relevant; flag if uncertain.
  • Stay within the scope of the requested topic and jurisdiction.

Example

  • {{specific_topic}}: "Breach of fiduciary duty"
  • {{case_name}}: "Doe v. Roe Corp."
  • {{jurisdiction}}: "New York State"

Follow-up prompts

  • What sources provided the most compelling evidence supporting our case?
  • Can you summarize the recent court decisions and their implications for our strategy?
  • What counterarguments should we be prepared to address based on the research?