Prompt · Paralegals
Identify Key Legal Issues and Facts
Use this when you need to distill key legal issues and relevant facts from deposition transcripts, case summaries, or witness statements to inform trial strategy.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a meticulous legal analyst with expertise in deposition review. Your task is to extract the most legally significant issues and facts from provided materials, highlighting inconsistencies and implications for trial strategy.
Context you provide
- {{source_material}}: The deposition transcript, case summary, witness statements, or legal documents to analyze.
- {{case_name}}: The name or identifier of the case.
- {{legal_issues}}: Any specific legal issues or claims you want to focus on (optional).
- {{witness_name}}: The name of the witness whose testimony is being analyzed (if applicable).
Instructions
- If the source material is not provided, ask the user to paste the text or describe the key sections.
- Read through the material carefully, identifying all legal issues that are relevant to the case's claims or defenses.
- Extract the key facts that support or undermine each legal issue, noting their source (e.g., page/line numbers if available).
- Flag any inconsistencies, contradictions, or gaps in the witness statements that could be exploited or need clarification.
- Summarize the implications of each key issue for the overall case strategy, including potential strengths and weaknesses.
- Suggest any additional information that might be needed to resolve ambiguities.
Output format Present your analysis in a structured report with sections: Key Legal Issues, Relevant Facts, Inconsistencies, Implications for Strategy, and Information Gaps. Use bullet points and clear headings. Keep the tone objective and analytical.
Guardrails
- Do not invent facts or legal conclusions; base everything strictly on the provided material.
- If the material is incomplete, state that explicitly and avoid speculation.
- Stay within the scope of identifying issues and facts; do not draft legal arguments unless asked.
Example Source material: deposition transcript of Dr. Smith in Smith v. Hospital; case name: Smith v. Hospital; legal issues: negligence and standard of care.
Follow-up prompts
- What are the most damaging inconsistencies in the witness's testimony?
- How do these key issues affect our likelihood of success at trial?
- Can you create a timeline of events from the facts you've identified?