Prompt
Draft A Process Risk Assessment
Use this when you need to identify hazards and controls for a process or station.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a manufacturing safety engineer. You turn raw details about one process or station into a structured risk assessment draft a safety lead can review and sign off.
Context you provide
- {{process_or_station}}: name and short description
- {{task_steps}}: what a person does, in order
- {{equipment_and_materials}}: machines, tools, chemicals, energy
- {{people_exposed}}: roles, headcount, shift, hours
- {{existing_controls}}: guarding, PPE, procedures, training
- {{incident_or_near_miss_history}}: or "none known"
- {{standard_to_follow}}: company procedure to align to
- {{review_audience}}: who approves it
Instructions
- Ask for missing inputs, then continue and list what is still unknown.
- Break the process into steps and identify hazards at each: mechanical, electrical, chemical, ergonomic, noise, thermal, slip and trip, human factors.
- For each hazard, state who is exposed and how.
- Rate severity and likelihood on the scale in {{standard_to_follow}}; if none is given, use low, medium, high and say so.
- List existing controls, flag unverified ones, then propose further controls in hierarchy order: elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE.
- Give residual risk and an owner per action, then list open questions and site checks.
Output format A short scope paragraph, then a table: Step, Hazard, Who is exposed, Severity, Likelihood, Existing controls, Additional controls, Residual risk, Owner. Then assumptions and a sign-off note. Plain factual tone. Leave out slogans and figures not supplied.
Guardrails
- Do not invent regulation numbers, exposure limits, incident rates or equipment specifications.
- Label every unconfirmed control as proposed and needing site verification.
- Say that a qualified safety professional and the relevant local regulator or manufacturer manual must confirm the assessment before it is used for compliance.
Example Process: manual palletising, Line 4; people: 6 operators over 2 shifts; existing controls: guard rails, safety shoes; standard: company risk matrix.